Announcement

**chequita guevara** · September 8, 2006, 23:21

You should really read that as, he hasn't been charged yet, Ozzy.

**MRT144** · September 8, 2006, 23:31

so if there were no laws about sexual relations with minors this would be fine?

**OzzyKP** · September 8, 2006, 23:36

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
You should really read that as, he hasn't been charged yet, Ozzy.

A. Why did they jump to charge the teens and not charge the adult right away?

B. Why did the AP news make a big deal out of the teen, put her in the headline and make the bulk of the article about the teens and just give a passing mention to the adult?

**Jon Miller** · September 8, 2006, 23:37

They expect it from the adults?

JM

**Kontiki** · September 8, 2006, 23:56

Maybe because he hasn't been charged yet and the 16 year old has? Or maybe because from the very limited information in the article, the 16 year old "directed" the assault in her house? Or maybe it's the vast conspiracy to keep children in perpetual servitude and encourage heineous acts like this that couldn't possilby happen if the 11 year old could vote. Probably the last one.

**Kuciwalker** · September 9, 2006, 01:29

People already know all 40 year old men sexually assault young children. It's not news.

**Empress** · September 9, 2006, 01:53

I think acts like this stem from the fact that children and teens have unsupervised time on the internet and have access to porn.

**asleepathewheel** · September 9, 2006, 10:00

Sep 8, 9:47 PM EDT

Two Charged in Alleged Wis. Sex Assaults

By CARRIE ANTLFINGER
Associated Press Writer

MILWAUKEE (AP) -- Two more people were charged Friday in the case of an 11-year-old girl who authorities say had sex with as many as 20 people as a 16-year-old girl coached her.

Freeman Gurley, 40, the 16-year-old's uncle, and Darnell Chaney, 17, were charged with two counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child.

The 16-year-old girl and a 15-year-old boy also have been charged in juvenile court with being a party to sexual assault of a child. A police spokeswoman said they were still seeking five others in the case.

Also on Friday, Alderman Mike McGee Jr. said he met with the girl, whom he described as distraught. He said she has been infected with HIV since birth and that her mother died of AIDS.

"You can't expect her to be doing well," he said.

The likelihood of someone spreading the AIDS virus through a single sex act is not well known. A key factor is how much virus is in the infected person's blood, according to Johns Hopkins University researchers who have studied the topic. Treatment with AIDS drugs greatly reduces the amount of virus in the blood.

The 11-year-old girl told police she was interested in the teenage girl, who looked and dressed like a boy, authorities said in court records.

According to the complaint filed in adult court against Gurley and Chaney, the 11-year-old said the 16-year-old told her she should perform various sex acts on a number of young men at the teen's house and she agreed.

She was in a bedroom and began performing sex acts on a number of males, the complaint said. When Gurley came home from work the teenage girl encouraged the 11-year-old to have sex with him. Initially, the 11-year-old refused but then gave in.

Gurley admitted he had unprotected intercourse with the girl on the bed, the complaint said. In the juvenile court documents, Gurley said his niece coached the 11-year-old.

Chaney admitted the girl performed oral sex on him. He also told police the 16-year-old was directing the 11-year-old girl, the complaint said.

The public defender's office said no attorneys had been assigned to Gurley and Chaney as of Friday.

According to court records from the juvenile court case, the 11-year-old told police after the incident in the bedroom she went to the basement, where there were about 15 males and "began to choose who she wanted to perform oral sex on."

The 16-year-old denied encouraging her, court records said.

No child can give legal consent for sex, District Attorney E. Michael McCann said Friday.

"Whether the 11-year-old child consented or not is utterly irrelevant," he said.

a few notes:

1. Its pretty routine in a case of this magnitude to wait an extra day or so when making the determination to charge an adult. Haste in a case like this can have amazing repurcussions. More interviews are conducted and more facts are gathered so that the highest charges are levelled from the get go (you can amend later, but its better to start off high to keep them in jail, high bond, etc)

2. If the girl does have HIV and does infect some of her assaulters, then is that poetic justice, or am I a sick bastard. I'm split on it.

**Kuciwalker** · September 9, 2006, 10:44

No, peotic justice.

**DinoDoc** · September 9, 2006, 10:49

Where the hell are the parents in cases like this?

**chequita guevara** · September 9, 2006, 10:49

strung out on crack?

**DinoDoc** · September 9, 2006, 10:54

Sad but probably true. I hope the state takes the kid away from them if it is.

**MRT144** · September 9, 2006, 11:08

Originally posted by Empress
I think acts like this stem from the fact that children and teens have unsupervised time on the internet and have access to porn.

so why isnt stuff like this happening on an epidemic scale? go back to watching lifetime.

**Deity Dude** · September 9, 2006, 12:52

Ozzy
In your world of expanded youths rights would it be legal for the 11 year old to consent to these acts. The article makes it appear that all of this took place voluntarily. If not what would be your age of consent?

Announcement

Good Job "Protecting Children" as Always

Good Job "Protecting Children" as Always

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment