I just youtubed myself a 'debate' between bill o'reilly and michael moore. Now, I'm a known o'reilly factor hater, I mean, this man brings nothing good to the table except bigoted stuff fueled with weird style of 'debating' which is more like who shouts their beliefs the loudest. Has no talent what so ever.
Michael Moore on the other hand, well, I don't have high expectations for him either, as he documents things to fit his agenda. However, I would think he would be a better debator, after all he is a pretty decent public speaker.
WRONG.
Moore was equally as bad as O'Reilly, if not worse. Seriously, he sucked butts, he went to the same level of debating, and IMO lost. Not like Bill won, I think they both lost.
From this day on though, I think Moore is as bad as O'Reilly.
So they are both on my list of public people who suck.
Michael Moore on the other hand, well, I don't have high expectations for him either, as he documents things to fit his agenda. However, I would think he would be a better debator, after all he is a pretty decent public speaker.
WRONG.
Moore was equally as bad as O'Reilly, if not worse. Seriously, he sucked butts, he went to the same level of debating, and IMO lost. Not like Bill won, I think they both lost.
From this day on though, I think Moore is as bad as O'Reilly.
So they are both on my list of public people who suck.
Comment