LOL, these idiots are an embarassment to the Left...

[Kuciwalker]

teban siting!

[joncha]

Originally posted by Darius871


I'm not kidding dammit, there's been a flower-delivery van parked across the street for 10 hours now.

Flowers By Irene

[Elok]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger
And this comes from a rabid Regan supporter...

I always supported Cordelia more, myself. But at least he doesn't dig that tramp Goneril.

Honesty
Gratitude
Filial Piety

BTW, what do you lovable commie-rats mean by the term "reactionary?" I've heard it used many times but never bothered to find out, since it's usually employed by people like the idiots shown in the OP whose opinions are unworthy of attention.

[Arrian]

Reactionary = counterrevolutionary type. Rightwinger.

In this context, probably a normal liberal like me.

-Arrian

[Saras]

A thread done by Serb clones

http://www.irtr.org/archive/marxleninmao.proboards43.com/index6037dbde2cc7a30e6002fec542538598.html?board=h&action=display&thread=1129515610

[Az]

did I just see the word "Wimmin"?

[Az]

anyway,

Dividing the world to "exploited countries" and "exploiting countries"
Dividing people and ethnic groups to "opressors" and "opressed"
Race wars
Survival of the righteous, and the death of the decadent
Nazism
Hitler

[MrFun]

LOL . . . . .



this thread is an embarrassment to Apolyton OT.

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by Elok
BTW, what do you lovable commie-rats mean by the term "reactionary?" I've heard it used many times but never bothered to find out, since it's usually employed by people like the idiots shown in the OP whose opinions are unworthy of attention.

Ask politely, and you might get an answer.

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by MrFun
LOL . . . . .



this thread is an embarrassment to Apolyton OT.

because you posted in it

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by Saras
A thread done by Serb clones

http://www.irtr.org/archive/marxleni...ead=1129515610

Well, these guys ARE stalinists after all.

[Az]

They always call things "decadent" and "reactionary", but I have hardly seen any substancial ideas, a model of a functioning alternative reality they propose.

Also, I rarely see any basis as to why their way is the right way. FE, Sex is rape. Why is rape wrong? Because it's sexual violence. What's wrong with sexual violence?

There is nothing there, except a hedonistic or virtue basis, which they label borgoieieuouauous

[Spiffor]

double post

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by Az
There is nothing there, except a hedonistic or virtue basis, which they label borgoieieuouauous

Actually, I found something of interest there. For my personal experience at least.

Among my young commie pals, I'm known for being eager to have more "philosophical" discussions, sometimes at the expense of actual political action. As I read this forum, I understood where intellectual ****ing ad absurdum leads:
1. It hampers on your ability to act to further your ends.
2. It makes you sound obscure, pompous, or cultish even to people who could have sympathy for your cause
3. Circle-jerk results in ideas that are completely irrelevant and unadapted to this world.

I knew that already theoretically, but now I have seen a practical example that has made its way into my experience

[Az]

Oh, I have nothing against a good discussion. Good discussions prevent stupidity. But those aren't good discussions. They're mastrubatory, pompous, fallacious bull****.