Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

You know what we need now? (Economy/Political Thread)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • You know what we need now? (Economy/Political Thread)

    Link

    WASHINGTON (AP) - The economy sprang out of a year-end rut and zipped ahead in the opening quarter of this year at a 5.6 percent pace, the fastest in 2 1/2 years and even stronger than previously thought.

    The new snapshot of gross domestic product for the January-to-March period exceeded the 5.3 percent growth rate estimated a month ago, the Commerce Department reported Thursday. The upgraded reading -- based on more complete information -- matched economists' forecasts.

    The stronger GDP figure mostly reflected an improvement in the country's trade deficit, which was much less of a drag than previously estimated.

    Gross domestic product measures the value of all goods and services produced within the United States and is considered the best barometer of the country's economic fitness.

    On Wall Street, stocks got a lift from the good GDP news. The Dow Jones industrials gained 72 points and the Nasdaq was up 23 points in morning trading.

    Fresher barometers, however, suggest the economy is shifting into a lower gear in the current quarter.

    In a separate report, the Labor Department said that new claims filed for unemployment benefits last week rose by 4,000 to 313,000 -- a bit more than economists were expecting.

    Economists predict that economic growth in the April-to-June quarter probably slowed to a pace of around 2.5 percent to 3 percent. High energy prices and a more moderate housing market will play roles in the expected slowdown in overall economic activity.

    If that turns out to be the case, the economy will have registered a seesaw-like pattern of growth in the last few quarters.

    The opening quarter's energetic performance followed a lethargic showing in the closing quarter of 2005 when the economy grew by a feeble 1.7 percent pace. Fallout from the Gulf Coast hurricanes, including high energy prices, prompted belt tightening by people and businesses.

    Consumers and businesses came roaring back in the first quarter, though, a main reason why the overall economy performed so well.

    Consumers boosted spending in the first quarter at a 5.1 percent pace, compared to a meager 0.9 percent growth rate in the fourth quarter.

    Businesses ramped up spending on equipment and software at a brisk 14.8 percent pace, up from a 5 percent growth rate in the prior quarter.

    And, companies' profits continued to grow briskly. One measure of after-tax profits in the GDP report showed profits rose 13.8 percent in the first quarter. It was the second consecutive quarter of such strong growth.

    The trade picture improved as imports didn't grow as much as previously estimated. That meant the trade deficit shaved only 0.24 percentage point from GDP, compared with a 0.55 percentage-point reduction calculated a month ago.

    In a third report, the United States continued to be the world's largest debtor country with foreigners in 2005 owning $2.69 trillion more in U.S. assets such as stocks, bonds and real estate than Americans own in foreign assets. In 2004, the investment gap totaled $2.36 trillion.

    An inflation gauge closely watched by the Fed showed that core prices -- excluding food and energy -- rose 2 percent in the first quarter. That was the same as last month's estimate and was down from a 2.4 percent advance in the fourth quarter.

    The inflation reading, however, was taken before oil prices shot up to a record high of $75.17 a barrel in late April. They are now hovering above $72 a barrel.

    To fend off inflation, which has been creeping up, the Federal Reserve was expected to boost interest rates at the end of its two-day meeting Thursday. The Fed's goal is to rate interest rates enough to prevent inflation from taking off but not so much as to hurt economic activity.

    Job growth lost momentum heading in the summer.

    Employers boosted payrolls by just 75,000 in May, the fewest new jobs since October.

    President Bush, coping with low job-approval ratings, hopes Goldman Sachs chief Henry Paulson -- the man who has been confirmed to be the next treasury secretary -- will breath new life into the administration's economic agenda.
    What we need now is for a Democrat to come into office, do nothing for 4 years and take all the credit for creating a thriving economy, which, by doing nothing, they destroy.
    Monkey!!!

  • #2
    barring the mass killing of the entire line of succession, a democrat isn't getting into the office of the President of the United States for a few(maybe 2) years.

    Comment


    • #3
      figures
      Monkey!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        which, by doing nothing, they destroy




        Doing nothing and letting the fed play around with interest rates is the BEST thing that a President can do during a boom. Just keep your hands off of it and it'll do fine.
        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.â€
        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

        Comment


        • #5
          Japher: To hear some talk around here, the economy is down in the doldrums.
          I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

          Comment


          • #6
            too bad the numbers disagree... but then, they're just numbers, they don't mean anything
            Monkey!!!

            Comment


            • #7
              well, i think part of it is, a strong economy isnt neccesarily something that translates into jubilation out of hand.

              all i know is its better than last year.
              "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
              'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

              Comment


              • #8
                But apparently the job numbers are not that good. Doesn't matter how fast the economy grows if all the benefits go to a bunch of rich people, while the poor get poorer. In theory, a lot of poor people should be able to vote out the current administration based on their numbers, fortunately, elections results seem to also have a lot to do with how much money you spend
                "The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists."
                -Joan Robinson

                Comment


                • #9
                  elections results seem to also have a lot to do with how much money you spend


                  The winner can rightfully say they improved the economy with a politicking stimulus package enacted before the election.
                  One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Japher
                    too bad the numbers disagree... but then, they're just numbers, they don't mean anything
                    McJobs, manufacturing going away, Bush sucks, and other doom and gloom nonsequitors.

                    edit - whoops Victor beat me to the punch.
                    "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                    “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.†- Jimmy Carter

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Those are Q1 figures. We're prestently at the end of Q2. Stop living in the past.
                      DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        average annual growth rate for Clinton’s 8-years in office = 3.7%

                        average annual growth rate for Bush= 2.75%
                        Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try. -Homer

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by flash9286
                          average annual growth rate for Bush= 2.75%
                          Is that all?? I'd have thought that the megabillions of borrowing from future generations would have given a greater illusion of prosperity. --But I guess I was wrong.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            We're still waiting for everything to trick down...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Whoha
                              barring the mass killing of the entire line of succession, a democrat isn't getting into the office of the President of the United States for a few(maybe 2) years.


                              Atually, it only requires the Dems taking control of Congress and removing the Pres and Veep. There's certainly enough legal reason to do so. Hell, it's Congress's frickin' duty to remove crminals from office. 3rd in line of succession is the Speaker, theoetically Pelosi, but I don't think she's gonna survive as Democratic leader.
                              Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X