Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Harry Potter's ass, grass?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Harry Potter's ass, grass?

    Harry Potter may perish in last book, author hints
    Jun 26 7:24 PM US/Eastern
    Email this story

    Harry Potter may perish in the final installment of the boy wizard series in which two main characters die, author J.K. Rowling hinted in a television interview.

    Speaking on Monday evening, Joanne Kathleen Rowling, 40, said she was well on the way to finishing the eagerly-awaited seventh Potter book.

    "I wrote the final chapter in something like 1990, so I've known exactly how the series is going to end," she told a chat show on Channel 4 television.

    "The final chapter is hidden away although it's now changed very slightly. One character got a reprieve. But I have to say two die that I didn't intend to die," Rowling said.

    "A price has to be paid, we are dealing with pure evil here. They don't target extras, do they? They go for the main characters -- well, I do."

    Asked whether one of the casualties would be Potter himself, Rowling said she had never been tempted to kill off the magician before the finale.

    At the same time, she added: "I can completely understand, however, the mentality of an author who thinks, 'Well I'm gonna kill them off because that means there can be no non-author written sequels. So it will end with me and after I'm dead and gone they won't be able to bring back the character'."

    The author said she did not want to commit herself either way on Potter's fate, telling interviewers Richard Madeley and Judy Finnegan: "I don't want the hate mail, apart from anything else."

    Speaking of her life as a famous writer, Rowling admitted to having been in denial during the unprecedented success of her first three books on the adventures of Potter and his friends at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

    "That's where my reputation for being po-faced comes from. I was like a rabbit caught in the headlights," she said.

    Rowling, who shot to fame from humble roots, also revealed that she still writes in cafes and based the character of Potter's good friend Hermione on a combination of herself and her sister when they were young.

    As for the future after Potter, Rowling said: "I don't think I'm ever going to have anything like Harry again. You just get one like Harry."

    The first six books in the series have sold more than 300 million copies worldwide and been translated into 63 languages.

    The first four have also been made into blockbuster movies.

    The seventh novel is reportedly due to be published next year at the earliest.
    "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

    “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

  • #2
    and I care because?
    Monkey!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      Of course Potter doesn't die. But the rumour will sell nice.
      In da butt.
      "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
      THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
      "God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.

      Comment


      • #4
        Read that... though nothing really new, except that there are two people that die that Rowling didn't consider dying earlier on in the series, and one who said originally was thinking would die, she granted him a reprieve.
        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

        Comment


        • #5
          I'll never forgive Patrick O'Brian for killing off (a certain unmentionable character). However, since that means jack squat to most everyone, I'll move along.
          Last edited by Lancer; June 27, 2006, 16:47.
          Long time member @ Apolyton
          Civilization player since the dawn of time

          Comment


          • #6
            It means you sure know how to hold a grudge
            Monkey!!!

            Comment


            • #7
              I'll get you for that!
              Long time member @ Apolyton
              Civilization player since the dawn of time

              Comment


              • #8
                How do you go from "I don't want to commit on Harry's future either way" to the headline "Harry Potter may perish in last book"? Typical media bull****...
                Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

                Comment


                • #9
                  Locutus, from this:

                  Asked whether one of the casualties would be Potter himself, Rowling said she had never been tempted to kill off the magician before the finale.

                  At the same time, she added: "I can completely understand, however, the mentality of an author who thinks, 'Well I'm gonna kill them off because that means there can be no non-author written sequels. So it will end with me and after I'm dead and gone they won't be able to bring back the character'."

                  The author said she did not want to commit herself either way on Potter's fate, telling interviewers Richard Madeley and Judy Finnegan: "I don't want the hate mail, apart from anything else."


                  It does seem she is being coy about it.
                  “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                  - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I bet Snape won't die (and was suppose to)

                    JM
                    Jon Miller-
                    I AM.CANADIAN
                    GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      That's my reading as well... but who knows? She could be talking about Draco as well.
                      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                        Locutus, from this:

                        Asked whether one of the casualties would be Potter himself, Rowling said she had never been tempted to kill off the magician before the finale.

                        At the same time, she added: "I can completely understand, however, the mentality of an author who thinks, 'Well I'm gonna kill them off because that means there can be no non-author written sequels. So it will end with me and after I'm dead and gone they won't be able to bring back the character'."

                        The author said she did not want to commit herself either way on Potter's fate, telling interviewers Richard Madeley and Judy Finnegan: "I don't want the hate mail, apart from anything else."


                        It does seem she is being coy about it.
                        I saw the full interview (it was for a British talk show), she was talking about authors in general (using Agatha Christie's Poirot as example), not about her own situation. The author of this article is trying to make a story that just isn't there...
                        Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Even using it to discuss authors in general, it still has an impact in her own situation. And she is being coy, saying how authors may want to kill off the main character and then saying she won't comment in either way on Harry's fate, saying she wants to avoid fan mail. She knows how to play the press, and she knew exactly what she was doing.
                          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Considering how pivotal Snape is, (it's nearly as much Snape's story as it is Harry's) I would think she would have decided Snape's fate a long time ago. I could be wrong. Maybe even she doesn't really know exactly who snape is.
                            "You're the biggest user of hindsight that I've ever known. Your favorite team, in any sport, is the one that just won. If you were a woman, you'd likely be a slut." - Slowwhand, to Imran

                            Eschewing silly games since December 4, 2005

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Oh, and why didn't someone make an Imran joke with that thread title?

                              (Possibly because the joke's rather stale, but whatever. )
                              "You're the biggest user of hindsight that I've ever known. Your favorite team, in any sport, is the one that just won. If you were a woman, you'd likely be a slut." - Slowwhand, to Imran

                              Eschewing silly games since December 4, 2005

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X