Originally posted by Cort Haus
The fact is that a significant portion of the market for business software is held by small companies. I've worked for a number of small software houses supplying an industry-specific product which has achieved a dominant market share in that sector. How can this happen if economic laws dictate that bigger is always better?
The fact is that a significant portion of the market for business software is held by small companies. I've worked for a number of small software houses supplying an industry-specific product which has achieved a dominant market share in that sector. How can this happen if economic laws dictate that bigger is always better?
Originally posted by Cort Haus
To me, the facts show that small can compete in some markets with big. Seeing as there are economies of scale benefitting the larger outfits, the smaller ones must have something going for them to stay in the race.
To me, the facts show that small can compete in some markets with big. Seeing as there are economies of scale benefitting the larger outfits, the smaller ones must have something going for them to stay in the race.
Originally posted by Cort Haus
Agile is the adjective, agility the adverb. I used each in my post, the first to describe a 'team' (a noun), and the second to describe the verb 'to scale'. I believe my grammar is correct.
Agile is the adjective, agility the adverb. I used each in my post, the first to describe a 'team' (a noun), and the second to describe the verb 'to scale'. I believe my grammar is correct.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a262/5a2628f3ed33df8f05f720a168bb46c4b9e7b8d6" alt="Wink"
But the method itself is called "agile."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da709/da7093a9dae8542dc9468a98b9635ce35a2a0448" alt="Smile"
Comment