So do you support Bush?

[Vesayen]

It has been in U.S. news sources alot latley.... Bush's horrific poll #s. Let's see how the Apolyton poll turns out. Is there anyone who is informed or watches the news anymore who could really support him? I'm chalking up the 30% who still do, mostly to ignorance and stupidity.


The question is not "Do you support the war in X", the question is exactly as it reads, do you support Bush?

I included options for non U.S. citizens so you foreign bastards will resist the urge to vote otherwise and sully the results.

[Lorizael]

I voted no as a foreigner, even though I'm an American, in order to sully your results, and because my real choice wasn't on your poll.

Also, very original and insightful thread. Where did you get the idea from?

[Vesayen]

How was your real choice not on the thread?

[Lorizael]

I don't really like being categorized as 'other'.

[Datajack Franit]

Yes, because America didn't start the war

[Lorizael]

It was always burning since the world's been turning.

[Vesayen]

Originally posted by Lorizael
I don't really like being categorized as 'other'.

What did you want?

There are too many other political affiliations for American citizens to list even half of them. The only relation I was really curious about was the relation of "yes" from any combination of conversatives and republicans" to "yes" from all other political affiliations.


Who cares if greens, statistically hate Bush? Duh? It is more interesting to see the relation between those who support him and if they are overwhelming conservative or republican.

[Lorizael]

Too many other political affiliations? Hardly. In America, despite the abundance of "parties" people claim membership in, there are only two sides that really matter.

Left. Right.

[Winston]

Re: So do you support Bush?

Absolutely.

And his numbers have gone up following the death of the guy with all the 500 pound virgins.

[Vesayen]

Originally posted by Lorizael
Too many other political affiliations? Hardly. In America, despite the abundance of "parties" people claim membership in, there are only two sides that really matter.

Left. Right.

Those "affiliations" are idiotic and more greatly reflect peoples willful ignorance then an active choice. Those associated with both sides no longer follow the dogma, associated with those sides.

[Lorizael]

Very true, and yet people still follow them. Kind of sad, really.

[germanos]

No.

He's a religious zealot, which is a big -1

Secondly, the bushisms: it either means he cannot express his thoughts coherently, which is another big -1 for a president, or it means he has no clue whatsoever, which is even worse.

There's a lot more -1's, can't bother to list them as the above two are enough to tip the scale in any case.

[Arrian]

-2 "You started an unnecessary war"

-3 "You ****ed up the aftermath of said unnecessary war"

-2 "You are a religious nutbag who panders to even crazier religious nutbags"

-2 "Your fiscal/economic policies are bat**** crazy, evil, or both"

-1 "You are a moron"

-1 "You think diplomacy means shouting loudly at foreigners"

-Arrian

[Lorizael]

I wonder how Dubbaya would do at Civ.

[Q Classic]

Depends on what level he plays as.

Only a retarded, draft-dodging Texan could **** up on Settler.