Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

There's something Media License in the State of Denmark

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • There's something Media License in the State of Denmark

    As some of you may know, I haven't had a TV set or a radio for about 3 years now. TV and radio programming doesn't interest me at all, save for a very few special occasions like e.g. the Olympic Games, which I still manage nicely to do without. It's a stage I have forever left behind, and I've been very satisfied so far not being a witness to all the nonsense on TV, and not having to pay the license fee, which goes along with it.

    As some of you may also know, in Denmark as in several other European countries, you have to pay a license fee if you own a TV. You have to pay whether or not you actually use it to view the national, state-run channels that collect the license. In fact you have to pay whether or not you use it at all. If you have a TV, you cough up. When you buy a new TV, the dealer has to report to the license bureau that a TV set has been sold to you so they can collect the license.

    2140 kroner per year. That's USD 350.00 per year. Doesn't matter how many sets you have, whether you watch the state-run channels or watch anything at all - USD 350.00 per year.

    Now comes the good part.

    Today, an agreement was reached between virtually all parties in Parliament that this license will henceforth be known as a Media License, and that it will be extended to include not only TV's, but also certain cell phones and other portable media devices capable of receiving TV signals - as well as all computers equipped with a tuner for receiving TV signals and/or having an Internet connection with a speed of 256 Kbit/s or above.



    Well that's just splendid. I have a connection of 1 Mbit/s and as of 1 January 2007, despite not watching any TV on the Net or otherwise, despite not having any interest whatsoever in TV, and despite outright hating the heavily lopsided, biased and left-leaning state-run channels which benefit from the license, I will have to pay $350 per year.

    For having a friggin' Internet connection!

    Right now I'm tempted to either emigrate from this goddamned stupid country, or downgrade to a 128 Kbit/s connection to avoid this moronic license whatsamathingy. But in the end I will conform. They will get their way. Getting me to pay for something which I'm utterly opposed to, haven't used for 3 years, and never will use for the rest of my life.

    Rest of my life.. Hmm.. I expect, with a little good luck, to live another 35 years, so that's (35 x 350) $12,250 I've just been robbed off today.


  • #2
    Come to the US
    Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

    When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

    Comment


    • #3
      I'd melt there. But right now even that sounds rather appealing.

      Oh, I also got a new job today.

      And it's my sister's 50th Birthday.

      Haven't had this much happen to me all at once since the days of the Ford administration.

      Comment


      • #4
        North Dakota
        Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

        When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

        Comment


        • #5
          I've bought a new TV recently, 40". Very nice

          Yeah, there is TV licencing here but they have not tried to extend it to anything else, and it isn't as expensive. Still, I am opposed to the concept on principle...
          Speaking of Erith:

          "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

          Comment


          • #6
            American media

            European Media licences

            Preserving some public space from complete domination by corporate influence
            Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
            -Richard Dawkins

            Comment


            • #7
              But why do I have to pay when I don't watch it.

              Comment


              • #8
                It's not the concept of the preservation from corporate domination I have a problem with, it is the concept of the whole method of admininstration. I am sure it would be far more simple to add it onto taxation rather than this stealth tax that we have at the moment...
                Speaking of Erith:

                "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                Comment


                • #9
                  Stealth tax? How is it remotely stealthy? You own a TV, you pay the license. In Denmark, you own a device capable of recieving TV media, you pay the license. Don't want to pay your TV license, don't own a TV. Its as unstealthy as it gets. And there's no way central government can raid the coffers like if it just came from general taxation.
                  Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
                  -Richard Dawkins

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    You can't get much more stealthy than starting to charge a guy like me for the apparently atrocious behaviour of having a fast Internet connection, yet not using it for anything remotely concerned with TV in either of its forms.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by OzzyKP
                      North Dakota
                      Population: 1

                      (after Winston moves there)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Starchild
                        Stealth tax? How is it remotely stealthy? You own a TV, you pay the license. In Denmark, you own a device capable of recieving TV media, you pay the license. Don't want to pay your TV license, don't own a TV.
                        Don't want to pay the TV license, don't own a computer and a decent internet connection

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Starchild
                          American media

                          European Media licences

                          Preserving some public space from complete domination by corporate influence
                          I will certainly agree with you on the value of a public broadcasting network - the BBC and ABC and other publicly funded networks in democratic countries provide an important counterbalance to Murdoch and co. in news and current affairs (and also give us some terrific original programming - e.g. the office, fawlty towers et al from the BBC)

                          Many countries (including Australia, of course ) manage to have excellent publicly funded broadcasters without resorting to a license fee.

                          And extending such a scheme to include "broadband" 256kbps internet services is just plain stupid. Not least because calling 256kbps broadband is a bit sad, but also because the state already takes its cut in consumption taxes, corporate taxes, etc on a monthly paid service (actually, the same could be argued for most cable & satellite TV).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Winston
                            Today, an agreement was reached between virtually all parties in Parliament that this license will henceforth be known as a Media License, and that it will be extended to include not only TV's, but also certain cell phones and other portable media devices capable of receiving TV signals - as well as all computers equipped with a tuner for receiving TV signals and/or having an Internet connection with a speed of 256 Kbit/s or above.
                            What the hell is the point of that?

                            I can understand the tuner for tv signals... but cell phones? Internet? Portable media devices? What's next?
                            This space is empty... or is it?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Ha ha.

                              Denmark sucks.
                              12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                              Stadtluft Macht Frei
                              Killing it is the new killing it
                              Ultima Ratio Regum

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X