Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chemical weapon used on US soil in Florida...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by MrFun
    On a sidenote regarding your comment about lyncing in United States; the worst of it was during the period of 1880 - 1930s.
    Agreed
    We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by loinburger
      You'd think that a weapon would have to, y'know, actually be capable of causing "mass destruction" to qualify as a "weapon of mass destruction."
      Indeed. The only devices are capable of doing so are nuclear weapons.
      (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
      (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
      (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

      Comment


      • #33
        or biological ones
        "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by dannubis
          or biological ones
          Biological weapons kill living things but they hardly cause any physical destruction at all.

          Also when you cause mass destruction enormous amounts of energy is released.
          (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
          (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
          (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

          Comment


          • #35
            Sounds like birch pollen
            Yes, but it hits you like a sledgehammer...
            "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
            George Orwell

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by DRoseDARs


              No, making gradations between terrorists and terrorists is splitting hairs.
              So now you feel that everybody defined to be a terrorist should face the death penalty, even if they don't intend to (and don't happen to) kill anybody?

              Thanks, but no thanks. I'm sorry if I see a difference between an act which kills 3000 people and one which would likely, even if succesful, not kill anybody.
              12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
              Stadtluft Macht Frei
              Killing it is the new killing it
              Ultima Ratio Regum

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Urban Ranger


                Biological weapons kill living things but they hardly cause any physical destruction at all.

                Also when you cause mass destruction enormous amounts of energy is released.

                So you're saying human lives killed are not as tragic of a loss as destruction of material things that can be replaced??
                A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Humans are replaceable. In fact, they're easily manufactured from unskilled labor.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    We now have "The Dildobomber"?

                    ACK!
                    Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X