WMP is supposedly much less computationally expensive.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New JPEG alternative: better quality with half the size?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by VetLegion
Usually better compression is achieved with the tradeof of being more computationally intensive. It's one that we should all be happy to make since processing power is still getting cheaper.
And while it's fine to say PCs would have no problems with it, people with digital cameras would certainly prefer one that is less computationally intensive for longer battery life/cheaper cameras."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Computation speed is an issue, but they only have to optimize it for a 8085/Z80 cpu, that is, work reasonable on it - then they don't have a problemWith or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
Comment
-
For digital cameras, more computational complexity = more powerful CPUs = lower battery life & higher costs..."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
Comment