Is this for real?

[Velociryx]

I'm curious to know more as well. Found this on their site:

The Hybrid Hydrogen Oxygen System (HHOS)

The future of environmentally friendly vehicles has already begun! Aquygenâ„¢ Gas can be used as a primary fuel source or fuel additive for gasoline, diesel and aircraft turbine engines. The HHOS can be retrofitted into existing engines with very little modification.


I'm curious...if it can be used as a PRIMARY fuel source, rather than a simple additave (to boost fuel effie by ~30%), why would you ever want to JUST use it as an additive? Why not go whole hog?

Methinks that there's something here we're not being told.

Nonetheless...if it's true they've got a DOD contract.....

Anyway, it might be something worth playing with to see what gives....anybody got a spare seven thousand bucks?

-=Vel=-

[Urban Ranger]

From the blurb on their website:

Aquygen™ Gas flame temperature itself is only between 259° F to 279° F when produced in ambient open air.

When the H2O Model 1500 Aquygenâ„¢ Gas Generator is used as a gas welder, Aquygenâ„¢ Gas can weld, cut, braze, solder, metal clad and fuse materials such as ceramics, metals, cermets, glass, plastics and inter-metallic materials together, such as metal-to-metal, metal to glass, ferrous to nonÂferrous, and dissimilar metals to each other, which is a true fusion process heretofore unavailable.

Huh? Do I look like an idiot to you? Huh? Huh?


@ Dauphin

[KrazyHorse]

Re: Is this for real?

Originally posted by alva
So? KH, this should be right up your alley.

Stop trying to give me a stroke.

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger

Huh? Do I look like an idiot to you? Huh? Huh?

Do you really want us to answer that?

[Dauphin]

Originally posted by Darius871


From the video:



If you can snag a defense contract you'll get all the financial backing you need.

If they got a defence contract it's only because Haliburton bought the rights to the invention.

[Velociryx]

Continuing to look into this stuff as I get spare time.

Latest information I've found points to at least some indications that it's similar to the very scammy "Brown's Gas."

I lack a sufficient science background to say if its differences are relevant enough to put it solidly into its own category or no, but based on the continued reading, I'd be.....cautious.

-=Vel=-

[Dauphin]

Are you implying that this new technology could just possibly, maybe, not be all it's cracked up to be? I'm shocked I tell you!

[Dauphin]

What I've been interested in finding out is if FOX news really did broadcast that. I find it hard to believe that they wouldn't easily vet something like that.

[Jon Miller]

DOD gives money to crackpots all the time. In fact, the DOD is generally more crackpotty than the scientists themselves, but the scientists are happy to take the money.

JM
(oh, can you study this beatle for me that my mom said can sense fire 100 miles away? I will give you millions.. a little study later it is determined that the beatle can sense fire a couple meters away (scientists have extra money left..))

[DRoseDARs]

Originally posted by Dauphin
What I've been interested in finding out is if FOX news really did broadcast that. I find it hard to believe that they wouldn't easily vet something like that.

The only way I can explain a statement like THAT refering to FOX News is you having your tongue so firmly planted in your cheek it looks like you're fellating an elephant. FOX News? Vetting anything? Riiight...

[Provost Harrison]

Hold on, you hydrolyse the water to create hydrogen and then burn that back to water? No one familiar with the laws of thermodynamics?

[Dauphin]

Originally posted by DRoseDARs


The only way I can explain a statement like THAT refering to FOX News is you having your tongue so firmly planted in your cheek it looks like you're fellating an elephant. FOX News? Vetting anything? Riiight...

I'm deadly serious. Have you not noticed that I have been nothing but serious all the way through this thread.

[Dauphin]

Originally posted by Provost Harrison
Hold on, you hydrolyse the water to create hydrogen and then burn that back to water? No one familiar with the laws of thermodynamics?

Penny, drop damn you drop. Ahhh, that's better.

[BlackCat]

Originally posted by Provost Harrison
Hold on, you hydrolyse the water to create hydrogen and then burn that back to water? No one familiar with the laws of thermodynamics?

For a cheap price of $6995.00 you learn how to get around that little obstacle.

Btw - I have some papers from my deceased granddad about cold fusion - you can get a copy for only $5995.00

[Dr Strangelove]

Their explanation is that they're not completely hydrolysing water to hydrogen and oxygen, but instead hydrolysing it enough to produce a structure change to " H-H-O". They claim that takes less energy. Frankly I don't know.