Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is representative government valuable, or only valuable for the things it provides?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is representative government valuable, or only valuable for the things it provides?

    Do you think representative government is valuable, or only so valuable as the things it tends to provide?

    I've been thinking about this a lot lately, combined with the fact that I think i've come to the conclusion the entire political process in the united states is either fraudulent or unrepresentative of the will of the people, or the voters, or all of the above.

  • #2
    I thought about representative governments the other day. And it seems that they don't work. The main problem is that there is no accountability for the elected people.

    Another thing which is probably even more important is that the voting process never leads to the election of competent and honest representatives.
    Quendelie axan!

    Comment


    • #3
      It is quite good at serving the powerful interests in a country. "Powerful interests" vary from place to place, but generally include those with lots of money.
      Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
      "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

      Comment


      • #4
        Depends - if the people are so smart that they elect the persons with the right opinions, it's good, but when they are so stupid the elect those with the wrong opinions, it's not good.
        With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

        Steven Weinberg

        Comment


        • #5
          The people are always stupid or uninformed or apathic.
          Quendelie axan!

          Comment


          • #6
            It's true.
            Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
            "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

            Comment


            • #7
              And this all leads back to Churchill's comment. For all its flaws, ladies and gents, it's the best we've come up with yet.

              -Arrian
              grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

              The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

              Comment


              • #8
                Actually, Monarcy works better for me.

                (that is in C3C )
                With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                Steven Weinberg

                Comment


                • #9
                  I was thinking about technocracy. Is it possible to make it work?

                  Does anybody know of any attempts in history to implement something similar.
                  Quendelie axan!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I don't think that is possible without making it a dictatorship. You would have to strip people from personal opinions to implement such a rule.

                    The closest to such a system I can find is tribal elders and the romans election of a dictator in crises.
                    With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                    Steven Weinberg

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I am not sure if it is called technocracy but what I imagine is a system where all jobs that are currently held by politicians are simply open for the most qualified person.
                      The population will only need to set some very general guidlines via referendums.
                      Quendelie axan!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Meritocracy...?
                        Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                        "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Maybe that is more correct term
                          Quendelie axan!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Nice idea, but how are you going to prevent it all ends up in the same kind of democracy we have now ?
                            With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                            Steven Weinberg

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              By killing anyone who so much as mentions the word democracy! Iron fisted rule to crush the non-meritocratic rebels!
                              Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                              "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X