Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

World economic linkages

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • World economic linkages

    If anyone doubted the global nature of our economy

    Market Minute


    A move by China's central bank to raise interest rates sent the Toronto stock market down more than 100 points as investors worried the attempt to cool the country's economy could dampen demand for oil and base and precious metals.
    Calgary Herald http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/...a-d3c34329ea8d



    This where we are headed in the information age. Demand from China doesn't have to ACTUALLY go down . . . all that is required is their government take an action that is generally designed to slow an economy, and the market starts figuring it into things like stock valuations
    You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

  • #2
    How do we know it was China that caused this drop in the TSE?

    The article is no more than you posted and I'm a long way from being an economist......
    "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
    "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Wezil
      How do we know it was China that caused this drop in the TSE?

      The article is no more than you posted and I'm a long way from being an economist......
      I agree and in fact you never know "for certain". And yes the article provides no proof or analysis . Even if the story writer were wrong about this , I still find it an interesting insight into the global nature of our economy that such a drop could be so easily attribued to a Chinese banking move
      You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

      Comment


      • #4
        Yeah yesterday was bad for my little stock portfolio too. That oil price better stay where it is damn it.
        CSPA

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Gangerolf
          Yeah yesterday was bad for my little stock portfolio too. That oil price better stay where it is damn it.

          ON a personal level, my portfolio feels the same way. I'm actually about to become even more linked to energy since my new job comes with stock options and a program where they match purchases of their stock (up to a limit of course).
          You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

          Comment


          • #6
            I heard this morning we could expect the market to react to the softwood 'deal'. Maybe this was what the TSE was responding to.
            "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
            "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't really understand all of the linkages and I know very little about global economics. But I do care about my oil stocks. I think the logic is something like this:

              Chinese interest rates going up -> reduced growth in China -> less demand for oil in China -> lower oil price -> stock market down

              Anyway, the Oslo SE definately responded negatively to the rise in Chinese interest rates (even though it was only from 5.58% to 5.85%). According to the newspapers.
              CSPA

              Comment


              • #8
                Bernanke (US Fed Chairman) told Congress yesterday that the US Current Account Deficit is mostly caused by forces outside the control of the US. He said that since the world depends so much on exporting here instead of developing demand in their own countries that Americans could only reduce the deficit a small percent by saving money.
                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Gangerolf
                  I don't really understand all of the linkages and I know very little about global economics. But I do care about my oil stocks. I think the logic is something like this:

                  Chinese interest rates going up -> reduced growth in China -> less demand for oil in China -> lower oil price -> stock market down
                  THats the logic but I would insert "and other commodities" in each place where you said oil when it comes to a Canadian analysis. Canada exports a lot more than oil and a Chines slowdown impacts nickle, copper, iron etc etc just as much.

                  Its just the average person doesn't pay as much attention to those
                  You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Canada is a big commodities producer, and China has become the premier commodities consumer for many commodities. Normally, we think about Australia when we think about Chinese commodity demand, but Canada is part of the global market for much of this stuff.

                    From the FT yesterday regarding "feeding the dragon"...

                    Last year, China accounted for almost half of the world’s consumption of metallurgical coal, over 40 per cent of thermal coal and iron ore consumption, and more than 20 per cent of steel, aluminium, copper and zinc consumption.


                    This demand has cascaded through the entire commodities market. China is a huge consumer of cement and other infrastructure building materials, f.e.
                    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Oops. Crossposted with Flubber, but said the same thing.
                      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        What commodities have been hurt by this?
                        I need a foot massage

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If this move means that China is starting to control its growth, hence its consumption on commodities, we should not complain (except some Canadian shareholders speculating on the stock market : ).
                          Statistical anomaly.
                          The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Brachy-Pride
                            What commodities have been hurt by this?
                            I haven't seen that yet but theoretically the change in stock price for commodity companies could predate an actual change in commodity prices by quite some time.
                            You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by DanS
                              Oops. Crossposted with Flubber, but said the same thing.
                              Yes but you said it better and with nice links and whatnot.
                              You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X