Originally posted by Flubber
I don't know the US constitution but the question you have to ask yourself is not shther your argumnet was a good one but whether in failing to make the one the prof indicated , you missed one that was equally strong or stronger.
As for talking to the prof, its up to you. Consider :
1. beeing "keen" and interested may be good for some consideration at final grade time
2. Do you enjoy such debates? If you do, go for it!!
3. Its possible you could convince your prof of something and maybe improve your grade !! But absent evidence to the contrary, I would assume your con law prof would be extremely well versed in the area and would know if an argument is viable or not-- But you know the prof better
I don't know the US constitution but the question you have to ask yourself is not shther your argumnet was a good one but whether in failing to make the one the prof indicated , you missed one that was equally strong or stronger.
As for talking to the prof, its up to you. Consider :
1. beeing "keen" and interested may be good for some consideration at final grade time
2. Do you enjoy such debates? If you do, go for it!!
3. Its possible you could convince your prof of something and maybe improve your grade !! But absent evidence to the contrary, I would assume your con law prof would be extremely well versed in the area and would know if an argument is viable or not-- But you know the prof better
Comment