The early M-16s had some teething troubles that were exacerbated by the weapon being rushed into combat. These problems were largely worked out within a year, but the weapon sustained an undeserved reputation for unreliability. I assume this is what Kalashnikov is referring to.
During the Vietnam war the U.S. was sneaking into the enemy arms pipeline and placing defective ammunition and arms in an effort to create much the same reputation problem the M-16 was suffering for the communists. Because of this U.S. soldiers were strongly discouraged from using captured weapons.
Finally, things that suck about the AK (I have one btw) are it is heavy compared to the M-16, inaccurate compared to the M-16 and for the equivalent weight you can carry a lot less ammo than the M-16. I do strongly prefer it was a club though, and I like its slower rate of fire, though the lack of recoil absorption reduces the utility of the slower rate of fire somewhat.
During the Vietnam war the U.S. was sneaking into the enemy arms pipeline and placing defective ammunition and arms in an effort to create much the same reputation problem the M-16 was suffering for the communists. Because of this U.S. soldiers were strongly discouraged from using captured weapons.
Finally, things that suck about the AK (I have one btw) are it is heavy compared to the M-16, inaccurate compared to the M-16 and for the equivalent weight you can carry a lot less ammo than the M-16. I do strongly prefer it was a club though, and I like its slower rate of fire, though the lack of recoil absorption reduces the utility of the slower rate of fire somewhat.
Comment