Tweet
Originally posted by Asher
The problem with Philosophers is even Aggie can be one.
The problem with Philosophers is even Aggie can be one.
-
Duly noted.
-
The "interactions" I spoke about are gravity, electromagnetism, etc. No idea what "Buddhist atoms" are.Originally posted by Harry Tuttle
You mean the interaction between Buddhist "atoms" of reality and real atoms?
Sorta. It was whether Randism presupposes that the mind is nonphysical.Originally posted by Harry Tuttle
So the argument was over whether Rand states if the presence of the mind can influence matter. As in whether the non-physical mind can influence matter?
(I was taking it for granted that Randism presupposes that mind can influence matter.)Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- ElokComment
-
Originally posted by Asher
The problem with Philosophers is even Aggie can be one.
So funny , yet so true . . . . .Comment
Comment