Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Positive net expectation values and gambling

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    You know, I wish I had stayed in science. Doing accountancy and not using my mathematical brain for 5 years has left me a dullard.
    One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

    Comment


    • #17
      It's a difficult calculation, but if we assume the same form of the lottery from previously, and that the rollover might occur again this week:

      180 million + 1.2 * (t) = prize pool

      prize pool distributed = prize pool * (1 - (1 - 1 / 76275360)^t)

      your expected return = prize pool distributed / t

      The breakeven point appears to be around 180 000 000 tickets sold (this is merely coincidence, by the way; it depends strongly on the percentage of money put from tickets into prize pool. At 50% it's more like 115 million tickets sold)
      12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
      Stadtluft Macht Frei
      Killing it is the new killing it
      Ultima Ratio Regum

      Comment


      • #18
        Assuming that buying one ticket is a good investment buying more will be a better investment. Guaranteed. So long as you choose distinct tickets, that is. Buying random tickets is a bad idea.
        12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
        Stadtluft Macht Frei
        Killing it is the new killing it
        Ultima Ratio Regum

        Comment


        • #19
          BTW, the factor

          (1 - 1/x)^t used in the calculation was approximated as exp(-t/x) to avoid the roundoff error that was sure to result from using the exact form. The error should be sufficiently small to make this approximation valid, given the very high values of x and t
          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
          Stadtluft Macht Frei
          Killing it is the new killing it
          Ultima Ratio Regum

          Comment

          Working...
          X