Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

American carrier sunk in the Pacific

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: American carrier sunk in the Pacific

    Originally posted by Chemical Ollie

    Well, it's a good thin we're paying the Swedes to homeport their sub in SD so we can practice against diesel boats, huh?
    Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

    Comment


    • #47
      Doesn't this happen every month or two?

      There was another post here on poly about some guy who sunk an American battleship with some fishing boats in an exercise.
      Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

      When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Re: Re: American carrier sunk in the Pacific

        Originally posted by Dis


        diesal subs can be quieter if they are run properly. As an electric motor and battery produce no noise. The only noise they make is the sound of the screw in the water (and water rushing over the hull). But with a nuclear plant you have reactor coolant pumps, steam turbines, various seawater pumps, and of course the big ass main feed pumps.
        Ahh, thx for the info. I also think our newest (non-nuclear) subs use some kind of fuel cells, so are technically not diesel subs anymore.
        Blah

        Comment


        • #49
          I think Italy's new diesels, as well as Germany's, are damn good boats too. Swedes make some good ****, but not sure if it is better to any meaningful degree than their European competitors.
          "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

          Comment


          • #50
            Now if the Euros would just sell some of these fine boats to Taiwan.
            He's got the Midas touch.
            But he touched it too much!
            Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!

            Comment


            • #51
              To sink the all-powerful Chinese carrier fleet?
              12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
              Stadtluft Macht Frei
              Killing it is the new killing it
              Ultima Ratio Regum

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by KrazyHorse
                To sink the all-powerful Chinese carrier fleet?
                No, to sink the ever-growing Chinese sub flotilla.
                He's got the Midas touch.
                But he touched it too much!
                Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Asher
                  All sailors are gay -- especially submariners.
                  That's why their boats are shaped so phallically
                  Speaking of Erith:

                  "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Urban Ranger


                    It also depends on how fast the carrier group is moving. If they move at a respectable speed they can't hear anything until it's too late. Esp if the torpedo can go at 81 knots
                    I believe thats why they would generally have subs in attendance, surface escorts that take turns drifting and listening AND helicopter dropped sonarbuoys AND even patrol aircraft with magnetic detectors.

                    I would think that the opposing US subs would be the greatest fear. I don't know how many submariners would be willing to fire a torpedo, even at a carrier, if they thought that an opposing sub was nearby.

                    Lastly How much damage could a single torpedo do to a carrier. I imagine the answer is "it depends" but it just seems that those boats are so large that its tough to imagine a single fish causing that much damage
                    You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      A question?? Are there any anti-torpedo torpedos?? It just strikes me that once a torpedo is detected its not like its a cruise missile or something. My understanding is these things come pretty straight in toward a ship. If the ship can track the torpedo, why could it not guide a defensive torpedo to intercept
                      You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by OzzyKP
                        Doesn't this happen every month or two?
                        Probably. But it's quite big news here. Last time we had "joint naval excercises" with the superpowers was when we used live ammo against suspected Sovjet subs in the 80's.

                        There was another post here on poly about some guy who sunk an American battleship with some fishing boats in an exercise.
                        Reminds me of picture
                        Attached Files
                        So get your Naomi Klein books and move it or I'll seriously bash your faces in! - Supercitizen to stupid students
                        Be kind to the nerdiest guy in school. He will be your boss when you've grown up!

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Most Surface Ships (small boys) have a NIXIE or some version of it, which is basically a noise maker on a wire dragged behind the ship. Combined with PRARIE/MASKER and certain manuevering techniques the main gist of which is to destory your wake, surface ships are not really that vulnerable to torpedoes.

                          They are much more dangerous firing anti-ship cruise missiles submerged. Though that gives their position away. We would fire a torp/ASROC down the bearing of an incoming torp either way. However, Harpoons and other missiles can change course a few times before heading in, making that tactic useless (alot of Euro subs use Harpoons).

                          Alot of times we just outrun torpedoes, no range and relatively slow (ie they will run out of fuel before catching up)
                          Last edited by Patroklos; January 18, 2006, 16:33.
                          "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Reminds me of picture
                            Looks like it is a Hellfire short, wonder where that dudes budies are...
                            "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Good reading

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                I think this pic would of use in this thread.
                                Attached Files
                                I drink to one other, and may that other be he, to drink to another, and may that other be me!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X