Tweet
how do you know how much is in ANWR?
-
-
I am relying on estimates that I read about in the paper, hear about in the mainstream media, etc...To us, it is the BEAST.Comment
-
0.1/10Originally posted by The Mad Monk
*glances at double paned windows in bedroom*
Nope...still need more oil.
If they don't have a coating for low-emissivity, they aren't doing much for you. And double-paned windows haven't been around terribly long; do you have any idea how many homes and businesses in this country don't have double-paned windows (with or without low-e coating) because of that? A great many more than those that do, that's for sure.Last edited by DRoseDARs; December 20, 2005, 18:42.The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.
The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.Comment
-
Get rid of your carOriginally posted by The Mad Monk
Nope...still need more oil.
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."Comment
-
And there isn't enough in ANWAR to make a difference... (with regards to our dependence on foreign oil)
Well, I don't know about that. The US imported an average of 12.5 million barrels/day in 2005 and ANWR can supply us with about 1.5 million barrels/day, which is a 12.5% reduction in our "dependence" upon foreign oil.
It sounds like everybody is arguing that since ANWR can't solve it in one fell swoop, there's no use trying.
Comment
-
No, the arguement is being made that there's no point in trying through ANWR. The ends don't justify the means when there are better ways of reducing our oil dependancy.The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.
The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.Comment
-
Improve energy efficiency as opposed to burn more oil.Originally posted by JohnT
It sounds like everybody is arguing that since ANWR can't solve it in one fell swoop, there's no use trying.
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."Comment
-
Why not just do it for the money?Originally posted by JohnT
And there isn't enough in ANWAR to make a difference... (with regards to our dependence on foreign oil)
Well, I don't know about that. The US imported an average of 12.5 million barrels/day in 2005 and ANWR can supply us with about 1.5 million barrels/day, which is a 12.5% reduction in our "dependence" upon foreign oil.
It sounds like everybody is arguing that since ANWR can't solve it in one fell swoop, there's no use trying.
Comment
-
why not do both? (not burn oil, but discover more oil)Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Improve energy efficiency as opposed to burn more oil.
It's not like China is going to reduce their oil consumption. We are going to need more oil. This combined with a good energy conservation plan can ease oil shortages in the future.Comment
-
not sure if this has been posted yet. With my track record- it probably has.
Comment
-
And so, it's Ted Stevens who ends up screwed, not ANWR."Stuie has the right idea" - Japher
"I trust Stuie and all involved." - SlowwHand
"Stuie is right...." - GuynemerComment
-
Screwing Ted Stevens
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dis
not sure if this has been posted yet. With my track record- it probably has.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/....ap/index.html
Comment
-
write something damn itOriginally posted by Odin
Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul TighComment
-
NPR is reporting that the ANWR drilling amendment has gone down in flames.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
Comment