Originally posted by aneeshm
I don't get the outrage over this . If somebody thinks that a bawling child will do the ambience of his establishment harm , what is wrong in his asking parents to make sure that their child does not spoil the ambience ?
I don't get the outrage over this . If somebody thinks that a bawling child will do the ambience of his establishment harm , what is wrong in his asking parents to make sure that their child does not spoil the ambience ?
The 'outrage' by the parents is so familiar: "How dare you tell me what to do with my kid! We have every right to be here!.......this business serves the public doesn't it? I can't believe this guy hates children so much......" blah blah blah. But the thing of it is, these parents are like a lobby. If they decide to boycott places that don't cater to their "I don't want to see a sign about my kid behaving.....what do you think I am, a dumb insensitive.....oh......well anyways, these places that are so anti-child are just evil", a boycott will hurt business. But the lemming factor has always been a problem in the service industry.....its just that this would be a particularly idiotic way to de-chic a neighborhood.......
Comment