In investigating a new building material - I'm trying to convince through scenario that the lightweight alternative would cut down on material needed for the structural support.
It's regarding a glass canopy that is supported by large steel beams. The comparitive material would weigh roughly 1% of the glass when applied.
Can it therefore be argued that only %1 of the current structural steel (if spaced proportionately) would be required to support the alternative?
It's regarding a glass canopy that is supported by large steel beams. The comparitive material would weigh roughly 1% of the glass when applied.
Can it therefore be argued that only %1 of the current structural steel (if spaced proportionately) would be required to support the alternative?
Comment