Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Car Insurance and LawSuits

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Car Insurance and LawSuits

    I have a freind who is getting sued. And I don't understand why. So let me give you the story.

    She pulled into the middle to turn, but at teh same time someone was driving fast down the middle, and she hit him. (note that you aren't suppose to do that)

    But ignoring that fact, I think that the insurance companies paid for cars and medical (For him, she didn't claim injury). Now he is sueing her saying that the insurance companies didn't pay enough, or something.

    Can he do this? And if people can do this.. what is the point of having insurance?


    Jon Miller
    Jon Miller-
    I AM.CANADIAN
    GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

  • #2
    (obviously he can do this.. but can he be successful at it?)

    JM
    Jon Miller-
    I AM.CANADIAN
    GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

    Comment


    • #3
      Forgetting the merits for the moment

      If a person is injured, the insurance companies will often settle up the property damage quickly but the pain and suffering parts are often not settled as quickly. If the injured person wants to push their claim, they must file a lawsuit against the person that hurt them. After all they have no relationship or contract with the wrongdoer's insurance company. The wrongdoer should immediately forward the claim to their insurance company who will

      1. defend the action and
      2. pay out any judgements or settlements up to the policy limits
      You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

      Comment


      • #4
        and on the merits

        here is absolutely no way I can assessthe merits of a given car accident but I do know that the standard insurance industry liabuility chart APPORTIONS liability in accidents where a left turner strikes or is struck by an overtaking vehicle

        ** Note that these charts are used to settle the property damage parts of MVAs without any consideeration of the actual merits. The idea is that the times you win or lose will work out on average and the cost of assessing each claim is not worthwhile for the few thousnad buucks involved. Note that a different determination can be and is argued often wrt personal injury
        You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

        Comment


        • #5
          yeah, I know that on the merits

          she had peopel give her their business cards the the scene of the accident (no one really likes the people speeding down the turn lane)

          I don't know how that part goes..

          JM
          Jon Miller-
          I AM.CANADIAN
          GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Jon Miller
            yeah, I know that on the merits

            she had peopel give her their business cards the the scene of the accident (no one really likes the people speeding down the turn lane)

            I don't know how that part goes..

            JM
            Well getting sued is a normal part of the process. The individual always is the one sued and then the insurance company responds to defend you.

            Everything here sounds normal except for the fact that it sounds like you believe your friend should win on the merits.
            You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

            Comment


            • #7
              I do think she shoudl win on merrits

              but I didn't know you had to put up with the court stuff if you had insurance.. I thought that insurance took care of that for you

              ah well..

              but they pay for it (or some of it) when you are done.. yes?

              JM
              Jon Miller-
              I AM.CANADIAN
              GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Jon Miller
                I do think she shoudl win on merrits

                but I didn't know you had to put up with the court stuff if you had insurance.. I thought that insurance took care of that for you

                ah well..

                but they pay for it (or some of it) when you are done.. yes?

                JM
                The insurance company defends the action. That means that the individual does NOT have a lawyer of their own (UNLESS the claim exceeds policy limits and you might be on the hook for it in which case individual counsel is prudent)

                As an individual her job is to pass along the claim to her insurer and then co-operate in the defense. She might have to undergo discovery and even trial but should bear NONE of the costs

                Again this is all normal
                You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Flubber
                  Forgetting the merits for the moment

                  If a person is injured, the insurance companies will often settle up the property damage quickly but the pain and suffering parts are often not settled as quickly. If the injured person wants to push their claim, they must file a lawsuit against the person that hurt them. After all they have no relationship or contract with the wrongdoer's insurance company. The wrongdoer should immediately forward the claim to their insurance company who will

                  1. defend the action and
                  2. pay out any judgements or settlements up to the policy limits
                  You forgot:

                  3. Either raises her premiums through the roof or drops her completely.

                  ACK!
                  Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X