Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Polytheish vs. Monotheism , Capitalism vs. Communism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The questions aren't equal - I might disbelieve in the existence of the coin.

    Moreover, you're trying to equate a lack of belief to a belief. The "atheist" response to the coin question is "I believe neither".
    Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

    It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
    The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Last Conformist
      The questions aren't equal - I might disbelieve in the existence of the coin.

      Moreover, you're trying to equate a lack of belief to a belief. The "atheist" response to the coin question is "I believe neither".
      In that case the atheist response to if they believe in god or not is "I neither believe nor disbelieve it's existence".

      Comment


      • Well, duh!

        (Sane) atheists don't actively disbelieve in God's existence, they just consider it an irrelevance on par with the existence of invisible pink unicorns.
        Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

        It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
        The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

        Comment


        • Originally posted by quantum_mechani
          In that case the atheist response to if they believe in god or not is "I neither believe nor disbelieve it's existence".

          No, my response is that the supposed existence of a god (whatever that entity may be) has not been satisfactorily explained, nor has it been proven.


          I fail to see how I can disbelieve in something whose existence is not even verified by any recognisable standard- the idea of 'god being everywhere' and yet god also being invisible, untouchable, unmeasurable, inaudible, and so forth, seem slightly contradictory, and ultimately, irrelevant, since if god's supposed state of omnipresence is in fact no different from a seemingly nonexistent state, then I think I can manage without the supposed divine one, thanks very much.
          Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

          ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

          Comment


          • There is no god.
            Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by chegitz guevara
              There is no god.
              Why should we care?
              Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

              It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
              The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

              Comment


              • Exactly.
                Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Last Conformist
                  Why should we care?

                  Because bad people will take away your rights claiming their god told them to do so.


                  Eternal vigilance is our fortress.
                  Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                  ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                  Comment


                  • That's all sorted then.

                    Now, was the Soviet Union a theocracy?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Cort Haus


                      Now, was the Soviet Union a theocracy?

                      Is that the real world Soviet Union (as seen on MTV), the REAL Soviet Union (as seen in lengthy queues and broken down reactors and dried up Central Asian lakes) or the Civ 1, 2, 3 or 4 Soviet Union ?


                      And by theocracy, do you mean a form of government which you are going to spend six pages not describing as being in any way different from any other form of government ever ?
                      Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                      ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                      Comment




                      • I was joking, Moll

                        I read that crazy thread on the Civ 4 forum where you were quite rightly arguing that the SU could not be a theocracy as it did not claim divine authority. That gollum bloke wrote 150,000 words which failed to challenge the argument, but did waste a lot of time and bandwidth.

                        Unbelievable.

                        Comment


                        • (x2 post deleted)

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by molly bloom



                            Because bad people will take away your rights claiming their god told them to do so.


                            Eternal vigilance is our fortress.
                            They'll do that utterly regardless of whether there's a God or not.
                            Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

                            It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
                            The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

                            Comment


                            • Well you're just a little ray of sunshine, aren't you?
                              Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Last Conformist
                                Well, duh!

                                (Sane) atheists don't actively disbelieve in God's existence, they just consider it an irrelevance on par with the existence of invisible pink unicorns.
                                Well, you must admit speculation about gods is much more interesting (if no more useful) than about pink unicorns.
                                The thing is, when you look back to the beginning of the universe, talking about the universe springing into being with no catalyst from anywhere starts to look a lot like the mystical stuff in most religions.
                                If there was a catalyst, it could have been quite literally anything, but you might as well call it a god. Of course, then you are left with the question of where did the catalyst come from, but that is far from proving it cannot have existed (not that I'm saying it did exist).

                                @molly and che:

                                I assume you are talking about the almost certainly fictional (though entertaining) gods most people seem to think of with prophets, smiting, and generally having to step and muck about with the universe constantly.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X