Tweet
But before Ming comes on here let me explain:
Since the beginning of the Nuclear Age the threatened Use of Nuclear Weapons have been a detterant and ended World War II with the dropping of 2 Atomic Bombs on Japan.
Analyzing the expected pitfalls as addressed by many members in the other thread about the use of force in Iran, I came to a simple conclusion. Any military action either by airstrikes or by an even more unlikely invasion would lead to the acceleration of 3rd World Countries Attempts to gain Nuclear Weapons. This is costly both financially, and to global stability especially among the supposedly allied nations.
So, what would deter a country from pursueing a Nuclear Arsenal? Certainly wars won't, nor will diplomacy? How about facing certain annihlation? --Yeah that would do it.
I know this measure would be seen as extreme especially to you Europeans, but it would send a clear and decisive message to all countries-- Pursue your weapons of mass destruction, and Your nation will no longer exist!
My suggestion to President Bush, is if diplomacy fails, to use our Nuclear Deterrant on Iran's Nuclear Facility. This is the only way to stop the proliferation of Nuclear Weapons in the World.
I talked it over with My God, and he was the one that suggested this to me. While he doesn't like loss of life, he does not like at all what Iran is doing, and what it is leading the world into.
So here I pose the question to my fellow Apolytoners, from varied backgrounds, ethnicities, and nations, would a nuclear deterrant in Iran stop the proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and solve the Iranian Nuclear Crisis?
Since the beginning of the Nuclear Age the threatened Use of Nuclear Weapons have been a detterant and ended World War II with the dropping of 2 Atomic Bombs on Japan.
Analyzing the expected pitfalls as addressed by many members in the other thread about the use of force in Iran, I came to a simple conclusion. Any military action either by airstrikes or by an even more unlikely invasion would lead to the acceleration of 3rd World Countries Attempts to gain Nuclear Weapons. This is costly both financially, and to global stability especially among the supposedly allied nations.
So, what would deter a country from pursueing a Nuclear Arsenal? Certainly wars won't, nor will diplomacy? How about facing certain annihlation? --Yeah that would do it.
I know this measure would be seen as extreme especially to you Europeans, but it would send a clear and decisive message to all countries-- Pursue your weapons of mass destruction, and Your nation will no longer exist!
My suggestion to President Bush, is if diplomacy fails, to use our Nuclear Deterrant on Iran's Nuclear Facility. This is the only way to stop the proliferation of Nuclear Weapons in the World.
I talked it over with My God, and he was the one that suggested this to me. While he doesn't like loss of life, he does not like at all what Iran is doing, and what it is leading the world into.
So here I pose the question to my fellow Apolytoners, from varied backgrounds, ethnicities, and nations, would a nuclear deterrant in Iran stop the proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and solve the Iranian Nuclear Crisis?
--I just love saying so little as so much at the same time 
Comment