Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is SP or MP more important for a TBS game?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I almost always take part in discussions involving Bulgaria or the Balkans. I often post in history threads too.
    Quite often i don't have the time to post or by the time I get to read a certain thread everything on the subject is already mentioned
    Quendelie axan!

    Comment


    • #32
      SP definatley.

      A game of civ3 or moo2 or similar games can take a few hours, or they can be an epic experience of upwards of 50 hours for *ONE* game. I don't buy TBS's for multiplayer, I buy them for their superb single player and the massive replayability they have.

      Comment


      • #33
        MP

        Comment


        • #34
          SP for the "EPIC APPEAL" since MP I dont have much time for (unless MP is considered PBEM, then of course )

          Gramps
          Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

          Comment


          • #35
            Multiplayer, at the end of the day the ai ceases to be fun as you have learned all of its tricks and how to deal with them.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Sava
              Civ 3 is just garbage
              no it isn't

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Dis
                SP

                multiplayer games suck. I either get in a game with a jackass who knows nothing about strategy and I roll right over him. Or I schedule games with some of you guys at Apolyton who read every single strategy thread and kick my ass .

                I'm an average player, and I can't find average opponents.
                I'll play you, Dis. I'm average, at best.
                Solomwi is very wise. - Imran Siddiqui

                Comment

                Working...
                X