White People's political party formed in my state

[Q Classic]

It gives Elvis and company a heroic scene that they never get in any other biographies.

(It's not fantastic, but it's good for a few laughs.)

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by Guynemer


Still haven't seen that movie.

I'm working night shifts this month (5:30PM - 7AM) as one of three senior residents in the hospital. When things are quiet, we crash on the couch in the resident lounge and watch DVDs.

Do you think this movie would be appreciated?

For residents working long hours, you will laugh your asses off.

ACK!

[Dis]

Originally posted by Kidicious
Let them win all the elections and then kick NV our of the union.

[Dis]

Originally posted by Kidicious


People who join a party for white people are rednecks. Whites who merely sympathize with them are racists.

we don't have that many rednecks where I live.

we call them white trash.

[Dis]

Originally posted by Caligastia
To even ask whether it's ok for a political party to be formed for whites and by whites is patently racist. Nobody ever questions the right of any other race to organize along ethnic lines.

Get used to it people, this is one of the many joys of "diversity".

I have never heard of a black people's party.

edit: I posted that before reading the above post. I feel foolish now.

[Tuberski]

You need to reread the thread, I posted one.

ACK!

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Caligastia
Nobody ever questions the right of any other race to organize along ethnic lines.

Because they have some sense.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Dis


we don't have that many rednecks where I live.

we call them white trash.

White trash is poor. Rednecks are both poor and can have money. White trash frequentlty associates with other races, rednecks don't.

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Frankychan
Or lets just have an "America should rule the world" party.

There's already atleast two of those.

[Last Conformist]

How about a Let's Demonize All The Other Parties Party?

[JimmyCracksCorn]

Originally posted by Patroklos


Sounds like you and the White Party hae something in common, an affinity for steriotypes.

How many of your proper, suited, doctorate educated WWII Nazis were rednecks?

Patroklos makes a good point.

Racism can often be a very subtle thing, its not all KKK lynchings in the south like it used to be. Racism is just as alive and kicking in the urban Northern US as it is anywhere else. Even here in Canada I see and hear racism all the time.

But its a good point. If you think racism is confined to redneck southerners then we're in a sorry state to actually combat it.

[Dis]

some people are just racists towards rednecks.

[Epublius Rex]

Re: White People's political party formed in my state

Originally posted by Dis

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Jul-21-Thu-2005/news/26915852.html

The party is formed, but they still need a certain number of signitures (7,914 signatures by Aug. 11, 2006) to be an official Nevada party. It scares me to think they may actually be able to get that many signitures.


Should such a party be allowed to exist?

insert obvious republican party jokes in the space provided below.

All parties have a right to exist in America- especially those with free beer!

Actually, under the Constitution, they need no signatures to be a bonafide political party- nor do they need your approval or anyone else's- that is the beauty of the COnstitution, the right of political dissent. It's too bad that your education prevents you from seeing and understanding that.

Political activism is the very esence of free speech- the speech that is unpopular is that which needs to be protected.

Besides, what is "PC" and what isn't changes from decade to decade and from generation to generation.

You purport to be a liberal, I deduce that from your comment on Republicans, so if I am wrong, correct me. Given that, I assume that you did not vote for and or do not like Jorge Bush as the president.

Why then do you agree with Jorge on the topic of illegal alien migration and on the topic of mass migration as a whole? I deduce that because you do not like this new party (insert name here) stance on immigration. Jorge Bush is all in favor of illegal alien migration- he has said so repeatedly and has called for amnesty for 12 million of them. He has also stated that he believes and wants to see that any employer who is willing to pay $5.10 per hour should be able to hire anyone in the world willing to work for that amount of money at any job an america will not do for $5.10 per hour.

Now, I am old enough to remember a time when Democrats understood what a scab was and also what labor union cracking was all about, but apparently, they are now all in favor of it. Under this new "PC" thought pattern, no one in this country presently employed is safe from loosing their job to someone from a foreign country willing to work for less- which includes your mommy and daddy who support you.

Just some food for thought..........

[Epublius Rex]

Originally posted by Guynemer
Of course they should be allowed to exist.

And I say, from the bottom of my heart, to all those racist jackasses: get as many members as you can, and march and rally and make yourselves as visible as possible.

It'll make it easier to identify you for re-education when the revolution comes.

Ahh, so you are a member or like thinker of Louis Farakan. He advocates white genocide as well.

Well good for you, it's always good to something to live for, even if you are living under a rock somewhere.

[Dis]

Re: Re: White People's political party formed in my state

Originally posted by Epublius Rex


All parties have a right to exist in America- especially those with free beer!

Actually, under the Constitution, they need no signatures to be a bonafide political party- nor do they need your approval or anyone else's- that is the beauty of the COnstitution, the right of political dissent. It's too bad that your education prevents you from seeing and understanding that.

Political activism is the very esence of free speech- the speech that is unpopular is that which needs to be protected.

Besides, what is "PC" and what isn't changes from decade to decade and from generation to generation.

You purport to be a liberal, I deduce that from your comment on Republicans, so if I am wrong, correct me. Given that, I assume that you did not vote for and or do not like Jorge Bush as the president.

Why then do you agree with Jorge on the topic of illegal alien migration and on the topic of mass migration as a whole? I deduce that because you do not like this new party (insert name here) stance on immigration. Jorge Bush is all in favor of illegal alien migration- he has said so repeatedly and has called for amnesty for 12 million of them. He has also stated that he believes and wants to see that any employer who is willing to pay $5.10 per hour should be able to hire anyone in the world willing to work for that amount of money at any job an america will not do for $5.10 per hour.

Now, I am old enough to remember a time when Democrats understood what a scab was and also what labor union cracking was all about, but apparently, they are now all in favor of it. Under this new "PC" thought pattern, no one in this country presently employed is safe from loosing their job to someone from a foreign country willing to work for less- which includes your mommy and daddy who support you.

Just some food for thought..........

where did I say I was against freedom of speech? I never said anywhere in my post that these should not exist (I voted yes btw). So don't go insulting my education. That's my job. but I'm still ashamed that such racism exists in my state. I was hoping we were a little more enlightened than other states. But I guess not. We are no better than Mississippi.

And I'm not a liberal. I voted republican up untilt he year 2002. And I still voted republican for some local elections. I voted for Bush in 2000, though I voted for Kerry in 2004.