Announcement

**Mrs. Tuberski** · July 22, 2005, 18:38

Originally posted by Epublius Rex

Sigh-

http://www.thetech.org/genetics/ask.php?id=67

"Except when people are of mixed ancestry, red hair in Africans is usually caused by a kind of albinism. When people think of albinos, they tend to think of white hair, pale skin and red eyes. While this is true for Caucasians, albinism works differently in people of African descent.

There are a few different kinds of albinism in people of African descent, but the one that gives red hair is called rufous albinism. People with this condition have a red-bronze skin color, ginger-red hair, and blue or brown eyes."

Don't you ever get tired...................

All you did was confirm what I said. You did not prove me wrong. Saying that albinos are pure white is not true. You have not corrected that. The link above is for your clarification. I found it long ago when I stumbled across an Afro-centric website claiming that whites with red hair are proof that africans colonized Europe- i.e. that red haired white people are evidence of race mixing. The poor deluded fellow. I wrote him and gave him that link.

I am sorry where did I say that they were pure white??? I said the skin color as well has hair color has to do with the level of loss of pigmentation. Time to reread what I did say. And not qoute me on your own speculation.

**BlackCat** · July 22, 2005, 18:42

Originally posted by Epublius Rex

Umm, I just did.

That- what you just did, is called a strawman. It's not a valid argument.

And that thread on GGS, I made no mistakes as to history, time and place. You may not agree with my assertion that culture, amongst many other things, plays a central role in history, but you cannot fault my order of events.

Don't know anything about your GGS thread whatever that is so I will just ignore it.

I really have problems calling your lack of knowledge of history a "strawman". You make claims and you give arguments to support them. when you fail to do this, people burn you - rightfully.

If you realy knew what you where talking about, you could never have made such a mistake as the NKVD
/KGB.

**Epublius Rex** · July 22, 2005, 18:53

Originally posted by Boris Godunov

Pray tell, what does that link have to do with your patently false assertion that the NAACP ousted its Jewish Founders?

Yet another link from you which has little relevance to the matter at hand!

Did you read it? It is the justification for their ouster. you know, they were treacherous himies.

It is hard to pull up a non anti-semtic website from google using "jewish" or "jew" in the search parameters, let alone "NAACP". All the links in the first pages refer back to white supremacist websites like national alliance.

This is the best I can do, and even the website reviewing the book is not so hot:

Broken Alliance: The Turbulent Times Between Blacks and Jews in America (Review)

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v10/v10p-91_Grubach.html

The IHR, an independent, public interest history research and publishing center, seeks to promote peace and freedom through greater awareness of the past.

Paul Grubach: BROKEN ALLIANCE: THE TURBULENT TIMES BETWEEN BLACKS AND JEWS IN AMERICA (Review)

http://www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/10/1/Grubach91-98.html

JHR, IHR, Journal of Historical Review, The Journal of Historical Review, Institute for Historical Review, Robert Faurisson, Arthur R. Butz, Butz, Arthur Butz, Mark Weber, Charles E. Weber, Thomas J. Marcellus, Willis A. Carto, James J. Martin, Austin J. App, Ditlieb Felderer, Udo Walendy, Wilhelm Stäglich, Andreas R. Wesserle, Adolf Hitler, Hitler, Holocaust, Shoah, Revisionism, Denial, Denier, Nazis, Auschwitz, World War II, WWII, Jew, Jewry, Jews

But the break between blacks and Jews in the arena of civil rights and their organizations had been old news for some time. It's why Jesse Jackson could make that statement and why the leadership of the various black organizations have seen fit to ally themselves with Farrakahn (SP) in recent times:

http://www.blacksandjews.com/Bond.ADL.html

There is no love lost between these two groups. Expulsion of the Jews has brought economic ruin on the NAACP.

The Palm Beach Post

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/opinion/content/opinion/epaper/2005/07/16/a10a_jeffersoncol_0716.html

They, the Jews, were their biggest benefactors.

**Epublius Rex** · July 22, 2005, 19:00

Originally posted by BlackCat

Don't know anything about your GGS thread whatever that is so I will just ignore it.

I really have problems calling your lack of knowledge of history a "strawman". You make claims and you give arguments to support them. when you fail to do this, people burn you - rightfully.

If you realy knew what you where talking about, you could never have made such a mistake as the NKVD
/KGB.

Okay, whatever. If it makes you feel good, go for it. You live in a world were only opinion and feelings matter, I understand that.

You searched and searched to find a problem with something I said so you could pounce on it, now, look a good little doggie, you will pull and tear at it until you feel good, then you will walk away.

But, since you set the parameters of this silly side show, you are now in question, since the NKVD did not come into being until after Hitler had taken power and after his alliance with Stalin had begun, you see, it was formerly called the "GPU" (which I should have known just from watching "Reilly, Ace of Spies") Which means you and your posts are now suspect and to be ignored.

it's fun how that works, isn't it? Ergo, by logic, I can now discount and forget your entire post/argument.

**Epublius Rex** · July 22, 2005, 19:06

Originally posted by Mrs. Tuberski

I am sorry where did I say that they were pure white??? I said the skin color as well has hair color has to do with the level of loss of pigmentation. Time to reread what I did say. And not qoute me on your own speculation.

I did read it, your post actually added absolutely nothing to anything, except to make the rather obvious statement that albinism was the total loss or near total loss of melanin, and that was it. ANd stating that I was wrong. WHich either alluded to the statement that African albinos existed or that they, though albinos, were still dark skinned. Which they are not, so you are therefore either wrong, off-base, or irrelevant, take your pick. "Dark red bronze skin" tone is hardly light skinned. Nor would anyone call blue eyes as being devoid of melanin or red hair, for that matter.

We have now devolved from the original topic which was "should white people be allowed to form a political party for whites only" To nonsensical side issues, which I take to mean that you cannot find legitimate cause (other then hatred) for denying whites the Constitutional right to form a political party.

**Epublius Rex** · July 22, 2005, 19:10

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: White People's political party formed in my stat

Originally posted by Boris Godunov

Yes, it's indeed sad that you can't give a straightforward answer and desperately try to change topics.

I wasn't the one stereotyping rednecks, that was you. I never said all rednecks were southerners--merely pointed out that, as a southerner, I'd known many (since it's generally acknowledged the South has a disproportionate amount of them).

You, however, asserted rednecks were racist. I pointed out that I've known many, and that is an untrue generalization. Now here you are trying to lecture me on what constitutes a redneck? Funny. And yes, sad.

I have not tried to change the topic- that is all of you who want to refer to other issues- I stuck on the target of the racial hatred and desire to deprive a group of people their Constitutional right to form a political party- just like other racial groups do in America. When you and your ilk could not find any reasonable means of depriving them of this right, you then devolved in petty attacks, which means, in internet debating etiquette that you have lost.

So go ahead, beat on dead issue and things not associated with the topic heading.

I am going to out for dinner and a show now.

**Mrs. Tuberski** · July 22, 2005, 19:21

Originally posted by Epublius Rex

I did read it, your post actually added absolutely nothing to anything, except to make the rather obvious statement that albinism was the total loss or near total loss of melanin, and that was it. ANd stating that I was wrong. WHich either alluded to the statement that African albinos existed or that they, though albinos, were still dark skinned. Which they are not, so you are therefore either wrong, off-base, or irrelevant, take your pick. "Dark red bronze skin" tone is hardly light skinned. Nor would anyone call blue eyes as being devoid of melanin or red hair, for that matter.

We have now devolved from the original topic which was "should white people be allowed to form a political party for whites only" To nonsensical side issues, which I take to mean that you cannot find legitimate cause (other then hatred) for denying whites the Constitutional right to form a political party.

You are still way off base on anything i said as far as albinos are concerned. But to snawer your question sure the whites can form a party, wheter they will be given any serious thought is another question. I really dont care who starts a political party. And for the record you are stating what you said not what I said , I never brought the word albino up, Or even care to discuss it further.

**BlackCat** · July 22, 2005, 19:25

Originally posted by Epublius Rex

Okay, whatever. If it makes you feel good, go for it. You live in a world were only opinion and feelings matter, I understand that.

You searched and searched to find a problem with something I said so you could pounce on it, now, look a good little doggie, you will pull and tear at it until you feel good, then you will walk away.

But, since you set the parameters of this silly side show, you are now in question, since the NKVD did not come into being until after Hitler had taken power and after his alliance with Stalin had begun, you see, it was formerly called the "GPU" (which I should have known just from watching "Reilly, Ace of Spies") Which means you and your posts are now suspect and to be ignored.

it's fun how that works, isn't it? Ergo, by logic, I can now discount and forget your entire post/argument.

Do you really think that I needed to make any kind of research to figure out that you didn't know anyhing about NKVD/KGB ? That has ben common knowledlege for years

Oh, they also had the name GPU - well, I might have been unprecise when I mentioned those organisations names - nevertheless, I is not me that makes claims - it is you.

I don't mind that you have your own opinion, but I seriously mind if you base it upon statements that by all means is wrong. At last, I really hate it when you try to make claims that are impossible, such as the KGB/hitler statement - idiots may belive you

**chequita guevara** · July 22, 2005, 19:39

The NKVD was just the new name of the Cheka, which was formed by Dzerzhinsky in 1919 in order to combat the White Terror.

Let's see, 1933 - 1919 = 14. Yet again we see ER playing fast and loose with "the facts."

**BlackCat** · July 22, 2005, 19:56

Grrr - I really hate it when a commie leftist agree with me - it totally spoils my image of being a rightwinger

**chequita guevara** · July 22, 2005, 19:57

Nyah nyah!

Even conservatives can be correct occassionally.

**BlackCat** · July 22, 2005, 20:00

Nah, what really worries me is that even your kind can undestand me - that is pretty scary

.

**Kidlicious** · July 22, 2005, 20:20

Originally posted by Epublius Rex
But hey, let's worry about the KKK. I hear dey be burnin down dem churches and rapin the folks back home all the time these days.

The KKK are gutless punks. They only do that when they have the law on their side and they can get away with it. Sort of like the way you only talk **** behind a DL, and would never talk it to our faces.

**Boris Godunov** · July 22, 2005, 20:38

Originally posted by Epublius Rex
Did you read it? It is the justification for their ouster. you know, they were treacherous himies.

Yeah, I did, and it says no such thing. Cite a sentence saying this. All I see is railing against the NAACP for still honoring Spingarn. How could the NAACP have ousted him, but still have an award in his name, hmmm?

I asked for something proving the NAACP had ousted it's Jewish founders, which was the preposterous statement you made. I still await proof of that.

It is hard to pull up a non anti-semtic website from google using "jewish" or "jew" in the search parameters, let alone "NAACP". All the links in the first pages refer back to white supremacist websites like national alliance.

Funny, I googled "jewish NAACP," and most of the links that came up weren't anti-semetic sites, though a few were. You wouldn't be.. *gasp* lying again, would you?

Broken Alliance: The Turbulent Times Between Blacks and Jews in America (Review)

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v10/v10p-91_Grubach.html

The IHR, an independent, public interest history research and publishing center, seeks to promote peace and freedom through greater awareness of the past.

http://www.vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/1...bach91-98.html

Why would you link twice to the exact same review? It's just two pages with the same thing. My my, you didn't, perhaps, fail to carefully read your own links yet again, did you? Or are you knowingly trying to pad out your nonexistent case?

Nothing in that (single) review proves your statement whatsoever. Please feel free to actually quote a statement in it that says the NAACP ousted its Jewish founders.

But the break between blacks and Jews in the arena of civil rights and their organizations had been old news for some time. It's why Jesse Jackson could make that statement and why the leadership of the various black organizations have seen fit to ally themselves with Farrakahn (SP) in recent times:

http://www.blacksandjews.com/Bond.ADL.html

There is no love lost between these two groups. Expulsion of the Jews has brought economic ruin on the NAACP.

The Palm Beach Post

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/opinion/content/opinion/epaper/2005/07/16/a10a_jeffersoncol_0716.html

They, the Jews, were their biggest benefactors.

None of these links prove your ludicrous statement. The first is a Farrakhan disciple decrying the NAACP for accepting Jewish money, which hardly indicates the NAACP has "ousted" it's Jews. And the second doesn't even MENTION Jews. Oh wait, it's Palm Beach...must mean it's about Jews, eh? Too predictable.

That tension has occured between black and Jewish groups isn't the issue. The issue is your claim, which is 100% false, that the NAACP "kicked the Jewish founders out years ago." There is utterly no truth to this statement, and you've not offered one bit of substantiation for it. Why not just quit while you're ahead and admit you lied?

**Boris Godunov** · July 22, 2005, 20:41

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: White People's political party formed in my

Originally posted by Epublius Rex
you then devolved in petty attacks, which means, in internet debating etiquette that you have lost.

That would mean you lost once you first posted on Apolyton, wouldn't it? I mean, every post you've made has been dripping with insults. You are the biggest loser!

I am going to out for dinner and a show now.

What's the show? Undoubtedly Birth of a Nation, so you can weep for the bygone days, eh?

Announcement

White People's political party formed in my state

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment