Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Of course it is. Arguing over whether the entity actually fits the defintion leads to re-evaluating the defintion. How else do you prove a definition is incorrect?
Oh, and btw, technical and precise aren't synonyms.
And again, it's arguing over a definition
NOT arguing over whether an entity fits a set definition
NOT arguing over whether an entity fits a set definition
Of course it is. Arguing over whether the entity actually fits the defintion leads to re-evaluating the defintion. How else do you prove a definition is incorrect?
Oh, and btw, technical and precise aren't synonyms.
Comment