How bad could Reihnquist retiring actually be? Is Bush really going to be able to appoint someone more conservative that he was?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rehnquist out tomorrow?
Collapse
X
-
Bring back Bjork!We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
Comment
-
Interesting...I can see the admin setting up another "compromise" to get one extremely conservative and one moderate-conservative out of this. Two at once? How many times has that happened before?"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
Originally posted by Q Cubed
I'm glad Bush gets to nominate two new justices. This way, the court will finally have the conservative court we've all been looking for, and do away with those damn liberal activist judges.
And then we will be stuck with stupid, power-hungry conservative judges.A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
How come in every discussion of Rehnquist quitting now, everyone thinks Bush will go for a comprimise of 1 conservative and 1 moderate conservative.
If he wants to satisfy the desires of his evangelical electors, won't he need to nominate 2 hardliners?Resident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ninot
How come in every discussion of Rehnquist quitting now, everyone thinks Bush will go for a comprimise of 1 conservative and 1 moderate conservative.
If he wants to satisfy the desires of his evangelical electors, won't he need to nominate 2 hardliners?"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
Well yeah, the Democrats are gonna filibuster if he nominates 2 hardliners.
But the same people who came out in droves to make sure gay marriage was eliminated in so many states aren't gonna be very pleased if the Supreme Court goes back to some kind of status quo.
As I understand it, for O'Connor's replacement, they'll filibuster anyone who's anti-abortion.Resident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.
Comment
-
As I understand it, for O'Connor's replacement, they'll filibuster anyone who's anti-abortion.
It looks like Gonzales is the most socially liberal candidate that Shrub'll appoint (the theocons consider him to be another Souter). But I'd much rather have a reasonable social conservative. Unfortunately Reid has seemed to endorse Speedy Confession."Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-Bokonon
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ramo
Not necessarily, since unless Kennedy changes his mind from his position in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, there are still five pro-choice justices even without O'Connor.
It looks like Gonzales is the most socially liberal candidate that Shrub'll appoint (the theocons consider him to be another Souter). But I'd much rather have a reasonable social conservative. Unfortunately Reid has seemed to endorse Speedy Confession.
Gonzales would be a good pick tho. I just think many Republicans wouldn't like'm.Resident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Speaking of which...
What defines a judge "legislating from the bench?" I'm curious as to what those opposed to "judicial activism" would say.
The case I posted eariler for instance:A law passed by congress said that a citizen convicted in any court could be deprived of the ability to lawfully possess a weapon, and the court ruled that it applied only to domestic courts. And they further said that if the law had meant to be for any court they should have said any court . that is legislating from the bench.
and for a more traditional example, the "right to privacy". It is a good idea, but we need to go through the amendment process and explicitly specify what it means and what it applies to. It does not as of yet exist in the constitution.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ramo
Not necessarily, since unless Kennedy changes his mind from his position in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, there are still five pro-choice justices even without O'Connor.
It looks like Gonzales is the most socially liberal candidate that Shrub'll appoint (the theocons consider him to be another Souter). But I'd much rather have a reasonable social conservative. Unfortunately Reid has seemed to endorse Speedy Confession."A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Comment
-
they should bring back duels"The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ramo
But I'd much rather have a reasonable social conservative.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
Comment