Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD gives up - Files Antitrust suit against Intel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AMD gives up - Files Antitrust suit against Intel

    At Yahoo Finance, you get free stock quotes, up-to-date news, portfolio management resources, international market data, social interaction and mortgage rates that help you manage your financial life.


    AP

    AMD Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel
    Tuesday June 28, 9:00 am ET

    AMD Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel, Accusing Co. of Forcing Customers Into Exclusive Deals

    SUNNYVALE, Calif. (AP) -- Chip maker Advanced Micro Devices Inc. has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Intel Corp., accusing its market-dominating competitor of forcing customers into exclusive deals to keep them from buying AMD microprocessors.

    The suit, filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Delaware, alleges Intel has bullied 38 companies, including large-scale computer-makers, wholesale distributors and retailers, to secure a monopoly in the highly competitive x86 microprocessor market.

    The microprocessors run the Microsoft Windows, Solaris and Linux families of operating systems. Santa Clara-based Intel's current market share of x86 microprocessors is about 80 percent of worldwide sales by unit volume and 90 percent by revenue.

    "Everywhere in the world, customers deserve freedom of choice and the benefits of innovation -- and these are being stolen away in the microprocessor market," said Hector Ruiz, president and chief executive officer of the Sunnyvale-based AMD.

    He added that "people from Osaka to Frankfurt to Chicago pay the price in cash every day for Intel's monopoly abuses."

    An Intel representative could not be reached before business hours Tuesday.

    In March, Japan's anti-monopoly watchdog, the Fair Trade Commission, issued a warning to Intel, saying that the company was curbing competition in the microprocessor chip market by pressuring Japanese clients to buy its chips.

    Intel denied the allegations but said at the time that the changes outlined in the agency's proposed cease-and-desist order would not affect its ability to compete in the Japanese marketplace.

    The European Commission has said it is pursuing an investigation against Intel for similar possible antitrust violations and is cooperating with Japanese authorities.

    According to the complaint, Intel has forced major customers such as Dell, Sony, Toshiba, Gateway and Hitachi into exclusive deals in return for cash payments and other deals. It also allegedly paid Sony millions of dollars for an exclusive deal on microprocessors and threatened retaliation against customers for introducing AMD computer platforms into their products.

    Rick Whittington, a Caris & Co. analyst, said the legal action has been expected and breaks no new ground.

    "The timing of this suit, in our view, is Sales and Marketing 101," he said in a research note. "Get the attention of the customer as market demand heats up and you have sizable supply coming down the pike. Put the competitor, to whatever extent possible, on the ropes and force them to adopt less aggressive sales tactics, if even marginal."

    Shares of Intel fell 12 cents to $25.74 in pre-market trading, while shares of AMD rose 25 cents, or 1.5 percent, to $16.90.

  • #2
    Is it really illegal for Intel to undercut AMD's prices to major OEMs if they stay exclusive?
    "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
    Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

    Comment


    • #3
      It is if you're AMD.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Asher
        Is it really illegal for Intel to undercut AMD's prices to major OEMs if they stay exclusive?
        Originally posted by JohnT
        It is if you're AMD.
        It is, period. It's called "shutting out your competition", people.

        Looking forward to seeing the courts give Intel the raping they've deserved for almost a decade.
        CGN | a bunch of incoherent nonsense
        Chris Jericho: First-Ever Undisputed Champion of Professional Wrestling & God Incarnate
        Mystique & Aura: Appearing Nightly @ Yankee Stadium! | Red & Pewter Pride
        Head Coach/General Manager, Kyrandia Dragonhawks (2004 Apolyton Fantasy Football League Champions)

        Comment


        • #5
          Exclusive contracts are not illegal last time I checked...
          "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
          Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

          Comment


          • #6
            Just wondering, but what are the comparissons between this case, and the Microsoft v. US case, the one where the supreme court considered breaking Microsoft into pieces?
            You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.

            Comment


            • #7
              Hopefully not much, breaking up Intel would be even worse than breaking up Microsoft. A lot of the chip R&D is centralized.
              "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
              Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

              Comment


              • #8
                Though I prefer AMD ( it works better ) , that's just stupid . AMD can have huge marketshare in developing countries like India , if they play their cards right ( they have both the price and the performance advantage ) .

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Asher
                  Is it really illegal for Intel to undercut AMD's prices to major OEMs if they stay exclusive?
                  It's not a question of undercutting prices (mostly.) It's things like withholding shipments of chips or payments that they're already under contract for because a company has chosen to use AMD in some of their other products (see compaq, hp, etc.) or attempting to use their market muscle to stop annoying things like infringment lawsuits (see intergraph.)
                  "In the beginning was the Word. Then came the ******* word processor." -Dan Simmons, Hyperion

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Perhpas AMD should sue the companies that cave into Intels pressure, since its thier choice in the end as to wether or not they sign a contract.


                    What kind of pressure are we talking about anyway? Are they sending out Michael Corleone to give them an offer they cant refuse or what?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Well, a former Compaq CEO did say that they basically put a gun to his head...I'm pretty sure he wasn't speaking literally, though.
                      "In the beginning was the Word. Then came the ******* word processor." -Dan Simmons, Hyperion

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Krill
                        Just wondering, but what are the comparissons between this case, and the Microsoft v. US case, the one where the supreme court considered breaking Microsoft into pieces?
                        None at all.
                        When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Asher
                          Exclusive contracts are not illegal last time I checked...
                          Not unless they're obtained by means of abusing market power or predatory pricing.
                          When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by reismark


                            It is, period. It's called "shutting out your competition", people.

                            Looking forward to seeing the courts give Intel the raping they've deserved for almost a decade.
                            It is, if, and only if, there is some unlawful abuse of market power, which is a question of fact, not of law.
                            When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I don't understand this hate towards Intel.

                              On the other hand, I hope AMD wins. Why? Because I hate America. AMD is a Canadian company; if Intel is forced to split into many different companies, odds are those companies would go under very fast. Which is good for Canada/AMD, and good for South Korea: Samsung.
                              B♭3

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X