Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chinese gamer sentenced to life

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chinese gamer sentenced to life

    Chinese gamer sentenced to life

    Qiu Chengwei stabbed Zhu Caoyuan in the chest when he found out he had sold his virtual sword for 7,200 Yuan (£473).

    The sword, which Mr Qiu had lent to Mr Zhu, was won in the popular online game Legend of Mir 3.

    Attempts to take the dispute to the police failed because there is currently no law in China to protect virtual property.


    Buying and selling gaming artefacts such as imaginary weapons is a booming business on the web.

    The internet games section of Ebay saw more than $9m (£5m) in trades in 2003.

    While China has no laws to deal with the theft of virtual property, South Korea has a section of its police force that investigates in-game crime.

    Dragon sabre

    According to the Chinese press, more and more gamers are seeking justice through the courts over stolen weapons and credits accumulated in games.

    In this case, Mr Zhu did offer to hand over the cash but Mr Qiu lost patience and stabbed him with "great force" according to media reports.

    The suspended sentence given to Qiu means he could spend the rest of his life behind bars, although it could be reduced to 15 years for good behaviour.

    The parents of the dead man are planning to appeal against the sentence.

    "My son was only 26 when he died. He was sleeping when Qiu broke into his home. He was barely able to put his pants on before Qiu stabbed him," said his father, Zhu Huimin.

    "We want Qiu to die, and immediately," he added.

    The case has led to a debate about where the law stands on virtual property, such as the dragon sabre owned by Qiu.

    Following the case, associate law professor at Beijing's Renmin University of China said that such weapons should be deemed as private property because players "have to spend time and money for them".

    But a lawyer for one Shanghai-based internet game company told a Chinese newspaper that the weapons were in fact just data created by games providers and therefore not the property of gamers.


    BBC, News, BBC News, news online, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service
    Co-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
    Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
    giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog

  • #2
    You take Kyoto and I'll cut you man!


    I wonder if any Civ games have ended in threats...or violence.
    Long time member @ Apolyton
    Civilization player since the dawn of time

    Comment


    • #3
      Wasn't this posted a long time ago?

      Comment


      • #4
        This is ****ing crazy.


        What is the status of virtual property in the US.
        Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

        Comment


        • #5
          This stuff doesn't really exist...I guess I don't get it.
          Long time member @ Apolyton
          Civilization player since the dawn of time

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Sprayber
            What is the status of virtual property in the US.
            I've never heard of a case like this. Maybe Imran has.

            I do know that virtual property is bought and sold in the U.S., so sooner or later, something like this will happen here. There was a case where someone sold the idea of using Burton and Taylor together in Taming of the Shrew. That was just an idea, very similar to virtual property. I'm betting that it's property.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Kuciwalker
              Wasn't this posted a long time ago?
              IIRC a sentence wasn't handed down then.
              Pool Manager - Lombardi Handicappers League - An NFL Pick 'Em Pool

              https://youtu.be/HLNhPMQnWu4

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Lancer
                You take Kyoto and I'll cut you man!


                I wonder if any Civ games have ended in threats...or violence.
                The multi-team demogame somethimes comes close.
                Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Sprayber
                  This is ****ing crazy.


                  What is the status of virtual property in the US.
                  I think virtual property is always owned by the company which provides the service.
                  I changed my signature

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    they can in an instant devalue it to worthlessness but I'm not sure that they own it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X