Godwinizing the Bush Administration.

[The Emperor Fabulous]

What did I do?

I never compared them to Nazis, or at least that wasn't my intention. The question was why did these "good Germans" continue to support the regime. I believe Colin Powell to be a good person and the Neo-cons are very bad people. Had it been about a good Russian following Stalin, I would've said the same thing.

My point was, why does anyone who is "good" follow people that are "bad". It wasn't irrelevant.

A full apology in the form of a one-page, typed, size 12 font essay is expected.

[JohnT]

What you meant was irrelevant. I was merely using your post as an example of a wider phenomenon.

[The Emperor Fabulous]

I'm sorry, but what I meant WAS relevant. I don't care what your opinion is on that, to me it was relevant. Of course, it would've helped if I had made more of a point. Pointlessness does not mean irrelevant.

[BlackCat]

Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
I'm sorry, but what I meant WAS relevant. I don't care what your opinion is on that, to me it was relevant. Of course, it would've helped if I had made more of a point. Pointlessness does not mean irrelevant.

Pointlessness has some pretty close cousins called spam, threadjack and kneejerk - can also pass as "praeteo censui Khartaginem esse delendam" statements (no spelling guarantee .

[JohnT]

Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
I'm sorry, but what I meant WAS relevant. I don't care what your opinion is on that, to me it was relevant. Of course, it would've helped if I had made more of a point. Pointlessness does not mean irrelevant.

No, no, no. I misspoke.

What you meant was irrelevant for the purposes of this thread. I'm sure it was relevant for the thread in which you posted.

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by JohnT
What you meant was irrelevant for the purposes of this thread. I'm sure it was relevant for the thread in which you posted.

Except that in the very first post in this thread, you point to what he wrote in that thread and call it "silly and irrelevant."

[MichaeltheGreat]

Which, for purposes of this thread, it was.

[Stefu]

OH WELL BUT WHAT ABOUT CLINTON?

[BlackCat]

Originally posted by Stefu
OH WELL BUT WHAT ABOUT CLINTON?

Well, since he practiced things in the oral room that aren't allowed to be told about at this site, then he goes free-

[chequita guevara]

You mean the ovaries orafice.

[BlackCat]

All that I remember is some unusual use of cigars, but I may be wrong. (oh, almost forgot, there was also those nonsex activites stories - actually, here nonsex activities would be handing over papers etc, but american standards may be different)

[JohnT]

Shiite, Boris, you actually expect me to go back and check myself to see if what I'm writing is consistent what what I wrote?

What sort of OTer are you!?!

[JohnT]

Oh, and Emp Fab, ....

... nah.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by JohnT
Shiite, Boris, you actually expect me to go back and check myself to see if what I'm writing is consistent what what I wrote?

What sort of OTer are you!?!

This is too funny.



First Imran, JohnT, and Boris bickered over something as trivial as technical correctness of Star Wars titles in a different thread.


And now JohnT, Boris, and ETF are setting out to bicker endlessly about something else trivial.


I think I'm beginning to see the formation of a new pattern with Boris and JohnT.

[Sprayber]

Originally posted by MrFun



This is too funny.



First Imran, JohnT, and Boris bickered over something as trivial as technical correctness of Star Wars titles in a different thread.


And now JohnT, Boris, and ETF are setting out to bicker endlessly about something else trivial.


I think I'm beginning to see the formation of a new pattern with Boris and JohnT.

Boris and che don't like you so don't mention them.