I am supposed to write a speech on a person and I chose Heinz Guderian. I was somewhat surprised when I was told to "tread carefully" when researching and coming up with my presentation, considering Guderian was not charged with war crimes and was looked down because he was not a Nazi.
Yet joncha brought up a solid point.
So? If Rommel and Guderian are considered "good WWII Germans", why did they continue fighting?
Yet joncha brought up a solid point.
jon. says:
well... you also need to address why he continued serving the regime
Frozzy says:
Why did Rommel?
jon. says:
that will be the question they ask, though
jon. says:
same goes for Rommel, too
jon. says:
"if he's such a nice guy, why didn't he resign?
Frozzy says:
Because he was a soldier.
jon. says:
not good enough
jon. says:
and that's where you need to be careful
[...]
jon. says:
and their actions supported a regime that did
Frozzy says:
A case of the few blotching the record of the many right?
jon. says:
no
jon. says:
even the "good" ones were in support of the wrong
jon. says:
and should have known better
well... you also need to address why he continued serving the regime
Frozzy says:
Why did Rommel?
jon. says:
that will be the question they ask, though
jon. says:
same goes for Rommel, too
jon. says:
"if he's such a nice guy, why didn't he resign?
Frozzy says:
Because he was a soldier.
jon. says:
not good enough
jon. says:
and that's where you need to be careful
[...]
jon. says:
and their actions supported a regime that did
Frozzy says:
A case of the few blotching the record of the many right?
jon. says:
no
jon. says:
even the "good" ones were in support of the wrong
jon. says:
and should have known better
Comment