Tweet
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
How is hanging on an idea dispite the fact that such an idea is wrong a positive thing?
How is hanging on an idea dispite the fact that such an idea is wrong a positive thing?
-
The idea need not necessarily be a bad one for a fanatic to be unreasoning about following it.Concrete, Abstract, or Squoingy?
"I don't believe in giving scripting languages because the only additional power they give users is the power to create bugs." - Mike Breitkreutz, Firaxis -
I am not sure about that.Originally posted by Jon Miller
someone who has strong convictions jumps on the wagon when there is a just a bit of motion, but he won't start the wagon moving
Gandhi does not come across as a fanatic. Neither were the Buddha, Lao Tzu, and Confucius.
Darwin wasn't a fanatic, and neither was his "bulldog" Huxley.(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."Comment
-
Gandhi was most definitely a fanatic
I don't know about Darwin, but Boltzmann was (as was Einstein)
I don't know enough about many of the chinese you mentioned.. but I bet Buddha wa sa fanatic
Jon MillerJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.Comment
-
word
Originally posted by duke o' york
'Poly's better.Comment
Comment