So I'm on a plane this weekend where, once again, I did not get peanuts. If you haven't flown lately, you may not know that peanuts seem to have been phased out of the airlines' food repetoire -- rendering anachronistic hundreds of stand-up comedy routines -- because some people are so allergic to peanuts that even being near them can lead to illness, if not death.
But, as Homer Simpson often reminds us, peanuts are really, really yummy.
So, I'm sitting at 35,000 feet, not eating peanuts, and I'm thinking: which better explains peanut allergies, creationism or evolution? On the one hand, an allergy to peanuts serves no evolutionary purpose that I can fathom. On the other hand, I also can't imagine the twisted theology that explains how an omnipotent deity wants some of us, but only some of us, to die from eating peanuts.
So I want an explanation. Whose got it? Let's settle this whole creationism/evolution thing once and for all.
(Incidently, instead of peanuts, got yummy cashews one way, icky rice-and-seaweed stuff the other way, great meals both ways -- including a steak in economy! Thai Airlines )
But, as Homer Simpson often reminds us, peanuts are really, really yummy.
So, I'm sitting at 35,000 feet, not eating peanuts, and I'm thinking: which better explains peanut allergies, creationism or evolution? On the one hand, an allergy to peanuts serves no evolutionary purpose that I can fathom. On the other hand, I also can't imagine the twisted theology that explains how an omnipotent deity wants some of us, but only some of us, to die from eating peanuts.
So I want an explanation. Whose got it? Let's settle this whole creationism/evolution thing once and for all.
(Incidently, instead of peanuts, got yummy cashews one way, icky rice-and-seaweed stuff the other way, great meals both ways -- including a steak in economy! Thai Airlines )
Comment