Report: N. Korea May Have Fired Missile

[Ned]

Q Cubed, aka, Dear Leader, I trust your words of peace completely!!!! Why, when you violated the deal that Clinton made with you to stop your nuclear program, I knew that we could trust every statement you made, implicity.

[Q Classic]

Q Cubed, aka, Dear Leader, I trust your words of peace completely!!!! Why, when you violated the deal that Clinton made with you to stop your nuclear program, I knew that we could trust every statement you made, implicity.

I'm glad you have received the proper schooling.

[SlowwHand]

I haven't sifted through all the trash.
Che's response convinced me that was a bad idea, while illustrating to perfection my observation regarding priorities.

If it was pointed out already, allow me to concur that North Korea is ruled by one of the world's most barbaric dictators.

Let me also point out the fact that North Korea still hasn't started on their half of a joint venture with South Korea that called for a joining of roadwork, meeting at the DMZ.
South Korea has finished their obligation.

Here again, I'll bring up misplaced priorities, and let the wit wannabes crack wise.
The facts are evident.

[Ned]

Well, Q, what do you think of your statement in your persona as Dear Leader that you would view an adverse UNSC resolution as an act of war?

[Q Classic]

Sure, why not?

[Ned]

What then, should the UN back down or should it risk war?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Sprayber
I think the communists on the board have more responsibility towards being on the front line of any attack on N. Korea than people like Ned. It's they who continue to let a psychopath use Communism as a front for a bizzare and dangerous regime. Of course that would require a little backbone rather than internet ramblings so I don't expect much

WTF?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Ned


No it is not, and you know it.

It was a major reason for the war in Iraq. We had genuine fear that Saddam was developing nukes.

[Q Classic]

What then, should the UN back down or should it risk war?

Nah, the UN is a buncha pussies.

I need to order more Swedish whores.

[Q Classic]

No it is not, and you know it.

It was a major reason for the war in Iraq. We had genuine fear that Saddam was developing nukes.

I thought it was for humanitarian reasons?

I'd love a humanitarian mission from the United States with Swedish women.

I'm so ronery...

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Ned
What then, should the UN back down or should it risk war?

There's nothing you can do Ned. NK has had enough artilery to anihilate SK for a long time already, which is why the US hasn't done anyting already. People like you are just going to have to deal with it.

[Ned]

Kid, I am sure NK is no match for the US or for that matter for the US-equiped SK army. Why? Air Power.

The artillery is a nuisance that will quickly be dealt with.

The real threat are the nukes.

Will the UN get tough, or will they behave like scared children, if the six party talks are deemed a failure.

[Kidlicious]

You are seriously insane Ned. You're a mad man.

[Ned]

Originally posted by Kidicious
You are seriously insane Ned. You're a mad man.

Kid, are you suggesting that NK poses a real military threat to SK?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Ned
Kid, are you suggesting that NK poses a real military threat to SK?

Yeah, but I think war is pretty stupid anyway. You never know when you are going to get your ass kicked no matter how much the odds are in your favor. The object is to stay out of war and if you can there is a 100% chance that you won't get your ass kicked.