Originally posted by Ned
Is that what Dean meant? I thought he referred to Republicans, some of whom are liberals on social issues.
Any attack on Democrats would similarly be misplaced as there are social conservatives in that party as well.
Also, I think there is a difference between traditional economic liberals who simply want to help the downtrodden, and socialists who despise private power. I personally think that most of the traditional liberals have moved to the Republican Party, but there are some remaining in the Democrat Party. Oerdin seems to me to be a traditional liberal, for example.
Is that what Dean meant? I thought he referred to Republicans, some of whom are liberals on social issues.
Any attack on Democrats would similarly be misplaced as there are social conservatives in that party as well.
Also, I think there is a difference between traditional economic liberals who simply want to help the downtrodden, and socialists who despise private power. I personally think that most of the traditional liberals have moved to the Republican Party, but there are some remaining in the Democrat Party. Oerdin seems to me to be a traditional liberal, for example.
Comment