Why are Democrats throwing pies at opponents?

[Riesstiu IV]

Cuz Cheney eats all of their pies.

[Ned]

Originally posted by Dissident
more importantly, why aren't republicans throwing pies at their opponents?

Because Republicans believe in free speech.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

As opposed to free pies.

Generally speaking I would say Demonrats are trying their favorite tactic of trying to get folks addicted to free hand outs. Once addicted they have them in their hip pocket.

[Dis]

Originally posted by Ned


Because Republicans believe in free speech.

long as it isn't about sex, then yes.

[Odin]

Originally posted by Ned


Because Republicans believe in free speech.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Originally posted by Dissident
long as it isn't about sex, then yes.

As long as it isn't about sex or criticizing the War on Terror .

[Fake Boris]

Ned thanks for being the sunray of my day.

[mrmitchell]

I thought it was that many Democrats truly want to shut the opposition up, to drive them from the podia and to intimidate them from speaking again.

I question the kind of upbringing that brought you to believe pies were a weapon of intimidation.

[Ned]

Originally posted by mrmitchell

I question the kind of upbringing that brought you to believe pies were a weapon of intimidation.

Educate me, mrmitchell, what is the message that the pie throwers are trying to convey?

[DRoseDARs]

"Use cream, not violence."

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by mrmitchell

I question the kind of upbringing that brought you to believe pies were a weapon of intimidation.

He was raised by a couple of stooges.

[DRoseDARs]

Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.

[DRoseDARs]

And I notice, Ned, that you still haven't responded to this:

Originally posted by DRoseDARs
"Why are Democrats throwing pies at opponents?"

Why are Congressional Republicans, like House Majority Leader Tom Delay and Senator John Cornyn, threatening and justifying violence against largely Republican-appointed judges? And why is the Bush Administration not telling them and others to tone it down, insteading opting to call Delay "a friend" and saying they "[look] forward to continuing working closely with the [him]." ?

[Ned]

Originally posted by DRoseDARs
And I notice, Ned, that you still haven't responded to this:

I was not aware that Delay was threatening violence against judges -- at least not to the extent of the likes of left which sells Kill Bush tee shirts and whose Air America broadcasters openly advocate assassination.

That said, the more I see of Delay the less I like of him. Any Republican leader should set an example of good behavior. This would clearly put us in a different category than Dems who seemed to have no problem with Bill and Hillary.

[Q Classic]

Delay said that a time would come when the judges would be held accountable to their actions.

While it doesn't explicitly condone the use of violence, it's hardly a charitable thing to say. It's charged language, if you will.

Much like Ann Coulter--who uses nothing but charged language, often times qutie offensive.