Aggie, OTOH, deserves being thrown out from a 'copter over open sea, for being a baby-eating consie.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
8.2 earthquake just hit Indonesian fault line where tsunami quake occured.
Collapse
X
-
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok
-
Originally posted by Agathon
agathon, this is in responce to ned saying i deserved to be homeless because i make "vicious attacks" against him in a good portion of threads he makes. ned is a complete *******.
That's just wrong.
I on the other hand believe that you deserve to be homeless because you are a perverted, degenerate, liberal, enemy of Christian righteousness.
I hope you aren't offended."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dissident
I don't understand why there is no tsunami. This is a good thing of course. But also troubling that we can't predict them. hmm
With this one, the earthquake was deep enough for the seabed to not be affected terribly much, if at all, but naturally we can't tell if the quake is deep enough to avoid movement of the seabed until it's too late.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dissident
I don't understand why there is no tsunami.Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
Comment
-
EDIT: X-post with Docfeelgood
Precisely.
Think about it. It's easy to lift a bucket full of water, but to lift a bucket full of water and, say, 3 bags of cement, it's not terribly easy, easpecially when your weaker.
The trouble with prediction is that there is not enough information available at the time of the quake to predict. It's only afterwards we know what type of quake it was. Additionally, there is no set mathematical formula to say "At this depth and at this magnitude, there will be a tsunami". We simply haven't got a large enough population of tsunami to choose from.
Additionally, there are many other variables, such as water depth, postion of the moon, time of day, time of year.. again, we simply do not have the population size of tsunami required to make accurate inferences as to whether a tsunami will strike.
This only applies to centres like the Pacific Early Warning System, who are far away. If we have many buoys in the ocean, which is essentially an Early Warning System specific to that region, we can use motions of the water to predict a tsunami (because a 1m wave among 30m waves repeated many times post earthquake would generally mean a tsunami). As it stands though, we simply cannot predict when one will strike.
Comment
Comment