Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Implications of Quantum Physics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    PA, just because you don't understand it doesn't mean nobody does.

    Could you please attempt to state precisely what your quibble is?
    12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
    Stadtluft Macht Frei
    Killing it is the new killing it
    Ultima Ratio Regum

    Comment


    • #17
      Exactly, again!!! You can not comprehend subjectivity.
      www.my-piano.blogspot

      Comment


      • #18
        Who are you talking to, old bean?
        12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
        Stadtluft Macht Frei
        Killing it is the new killing it
        Ultima Ratio Regum

        Comment


        • #19
          I really do love it when people who don't understand a subject at all try to debate the philosophy of that subject.

          It's like watching two retarded chickens wearing boxing gloves fighting over Hegel...
          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
          Stadtluft Macht Frei
          Killing it is the new killing it
          Ultima Ratio Regum

          Comment


          • #20
            The Copenhagen interpretation is crap because it is anthropocentric, the cat, after all, is an observer. It is also counsciousness-centric, becaue a flea on the cat is also an observor.

            Quantum Physics makes my head explode, thats why I stick to Biology and Geology.

            Comment


            • #21
              Physics
              www.my-piano.blogspot

              Comment


              • #22
                Physics has reached the point of ridicule. It does not know anything further and it does not know what it tries to explain, It is loat in a grand world.
                www.my-piano.blogspot

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Odin
                  The Copenhagen interpretation is crap because it is anthropocentric, the cat, after all, is an observer. It is also counsciousness-centric, becaue a flea on the cat is also an observor.

                  Quantum Physics makes my head explode, thats why I stick to Biology and Geology.
                  Halfway right. The cat is indeed an observer. This has nothing to do with the Copenhagen interpretation, however. Anybody who knows anything knows that the cat is merely a metaphor...
                  12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                  Stadtluft Macht Frei
                  Killing it is the new killing it
                  Ultima Ratio Regum

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Park Avenue
                    Physics has reached the point of ridicule. It does not know anything further and it does not know what it tries to explain, It is loat in a grand world.
                    Trying to rationalise your ignorance because learning is too hard
                    12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                    Stadtluft Macht Frei
                    Killing it is the new killing it
                    Ultima Ratio Regum

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I find it amusing that PA, an economist by education, is questioning the ability of highly precise physics theories to make accurate predictions.
                      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I don't like the blabla about observers. It makes more sense to me to think that the cat is dead or alive with some probability than that it is half dead. What is really wierd is some of the slit experiments.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Any slit experiment in particular?
                          One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Park Avenue
                            But the maths mean nothing, at all.
                            It's like water or rice. Drop the s. Otherwise, what the heck is an individual math?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Dauphin
                              Any slit experiment in particular?
                              Can't recall. But all that stuff with interference patterns affected by second slit being closed even though individual photons are going down the path seperately,/

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                They aren't.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X