Last month, for example, there was a lot of chatter about the so-called wageless recovery. Now that the critics can no longer get traction by discussing offshoring or the jobless recovery -- the economy added 2.3 million new positions last year -- they're trying this new tack. I traced the origin of this canard back to a press release from the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal think tank in Washington, D.C., that says that wage growth in 2004 was an anemic 2.1 percent, "the lowest in the history of this wage series, which began in 1964."
The funny thing is, the EPI got the number wrong: It's actually 2.6 percent. But the validity of the entire report is in doubt because the EPI was looking at the wrong data set. The more relevant number, the median weekly earnings of all full-time workers, puts the pay increase at 2.9 percent last year -- the best in three years.
Comment