Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why did I know that Bush wasn't going to just propose elinimating wastfull spending?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why did I know that Bush wasn't going to just propose elinimating wastfull spending?

    Dramatic cuts part of Bush budget

    President to send $2.5 trillion plan to Congress on Monday
    Saturday, February 5, 2005 Posted: 9:44 PM EST (0244 GMT)


    WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush's budget will propose slashing grants to local law enforcement agencies and cutting spending for environmental protection, American Indian schools and home-heating aid for the poor, The Associated Press learned Saturday.

    Bush molded the roughly $2.5 trillion spending plan for 2006 as a response to a string of record federal deficits, and is sends it to Congress on Monday.

    The budget, the toughest he has written since entering the White House four years ago, seeks about half the increase for school districts in low-income communities he requested last year and a slight reduction for the National Park Service.

    Many proposals face an unclear fate in Congress, where members of both parties are sure to defend favorite initiatives. Democrats blame the cuts on the tax reductions Bush has enacted and say that other items his budget omits -- a Social Security overhaul and costs for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan -- will only make matters worse.

    "What it will lead to is growing pressure for draconian cuts," Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota, the Senate Budget Committee's top Democrat, said Saturday. "It's inescapable, the course he's led us on, whether it's this year or next year, is for very, very heavy cuts."

    Bush has said his budget will assemble federal resources for war, domestic security and other priorities and cull inefficient or redundant programs. Administration officials have said he will hold overall nondefense spending -- excepting domestic security -- to less than next year's expected 2.3 percent increase in inflation, meaning the programs will lose purchasing power.

    "I stand with the president that we need to eliminate wasteful spending and we need to look through all the programs," said House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle, R-Iowa. "There's no question that's not the easiest thing to do in Washington."

    The details obtained Saturday are the latest in a budget that will also seek savings from programs ranging from Amtrak and farmers' subsidies to Medicaid, the federal-state health program for the poor and disabled.

    According to figures obtained by the AP, Bush would slice a $600 million grant program for local police agencies to $60 million next year. Grants to local firefighters, for which Congress provided $715 million this year, would fall to $500 million.

    He would eliminate the $300 million the government gives to states for incarcerating illegal aliens who commit crimes. It's a proposal he has made in the past and one that Congress has ignored. Also gone would be assistance for police departments to improve technology and their ability to communicate with other agencies.

    The Environmental Protection Agency's $8.1 billion would drop by $450 million, or about 6 percent, with most of the reductions coming in water programs and projects won by lawmakers for their home districts.

    The Bureau of Indians Affairs would be sliced by $100 million to $2.2 billion. The reduction would come almost entirely from the agency's effort to build more schools.

    The $2.2 billion program that provides low-income people -- in large part the elderly -- with home-heating aid would be cut to $2 billion. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York, said the reduction would be "wrong-headed an inappropriate," especially with this season's jump in oil prices.

    White House budget office spokesman Chad Kolton said Bush has added hundreds of millions of dollars to the program since taking office and said his budget will provide "adequate resources to make sure we can assist low-income Americans."

    The park service's budget would drop nearly 3 percent to $2.2 billion, largely due to a reduction in its construction account.

    Several cultural agencies will get about the same as this year's levels, including the Smithsonian Institution and the national endowments for the arts and humanities, which distribute money to local groups.

    Even on the plus side, Bush's budget will show constraint compared with previous years. That in part reflects his pledge to cut last year's projected $521 billion in half by 2009. One lawmaker said the budget will estimate that year's shortfall at about $230 billion -- well under the record $427 billion it will project for 2005.

    Bush will seek about 5 percent more, or about $600 million, for the $12.8 billion program for low-income area school districts. Last year, he requested a $1 billion increase.

    Defense Department documents obtained Friday show the Pentagon's budget would grow by 4.8 percent to $419.3 billion -- $3.4 billion less than he planned to seek for 2006 a year ago.

    Other areas would fare better.

    The Coast Guard -- part of the Homeland Security Department -- will get $8.1 billion, $600 million over this year. Included will be a healthy increase for its plans to buy more oceangoing vessels, a boon to the new chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Mississippi, in whose state many of the ships are built.

    Community health centers would grow to over $2 billion, an increase of $304 million, or almost 18 percent, over this year. Bush said he wants to every poor county to have one of the centers, which are widely used by the poor.

    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

  • #2
    Also gone would be assistance for police departments to improve technology and their ability to communicate with other agencies.


    How can this be justified if we are serious about terrorism? Oh, and some of the other cuts suck too.
    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

    Comment


    • #3
      There aren't really many items that are wastefull, but cutting funding for local police seems particularly draconian.
      I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
      - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

      Comment


      • #4
        I would agree... but on the other hand, if funding for local police was increased, there are some people here who would whine about how we are becoming a police state, and start with the ole Nazi comments
        Keep on Civin'
        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment


        • #5
          we already are a police state.

          as an environmentalist, I'm disappointed to see the cuts in the national park service. Oh well.

          Comment


          • #6
            they should privatize the national pakrs, give a charter to greenpeace, Sierra, or some other organization, who will take care of it, and charge visitors. that saves 2.2 billion right there.
            "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

            Comment


            • #7
              Why is it when libertyrants always propse to cut something, they start with small things the popele like, never big wasteful things no one wants except some corporation?
              Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Lawrence of Arabia
                they should privatize the national pakrs, give a charter to greenpeace, Sierra, or some other organization, who will take care of it, and charge visitors. that saves 2.2 billion right there.
                We already pay $20 to get into Yosemite. I'm still pissed about that. How much would the Sierra club charge? They probably wouldn't even let you bring a car in there.
                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                Comment


                • #9
                  fees keep the poor people out of the national parks. they would just pollute the place.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Dissident
                    fees keep the poor people out of the national parks. they would just pollute the place.
                    In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X