Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Oil for Food" Insanity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    UN head of Iraq oil programme got cash, oil: probe
    02-03-2005, 21h50




    Don Emmert - (AFP)
    UNITED NATIONS (AFP) - The head of the former UN oil-for-food programme in Iraq, Benon Sevan, received large payments of cash as well as allocations of Iraqi oil, an independent enquiry said.

    The enquiry's first report into the scandal-tainted programme stopped short of saying Sevan took bribes but said his behaviour was unethical and in clear violation of UN rules.

    The findings will turn up the heat on the United Nations, where Secretary General Kofi Annan has admitted that the scandal surrounding the largest UN aid programme in history has cast a shadow over the world body.

    In a 219-page interim report into the complex programme, the probe -- headed by former US federal banking chief Paul Volcker -- said Sevan used his position to solicit oil on behalf of a Panama-registered trading company.

    It said Sevan had denied asking for the allocations but that his claims "are contradicted by the first-hand accounts of Iraqi officials involved," and said questions remained about cash payments Sevan had subsequently received.

    "In making such solicitations, Mr Sevan created a grave and continuing conflict of interest. His conduct was ethically improper and seriously undermined the integrity of the United Nations," the panel said.

    Sevan has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing. The 64-billion-dollar programme was closed in November 2003, several months after the US-led war on Baghdad toppled dictator Saddam Hussein.

    Volcker told reporters that the findings about Sevan were the "most disturbing" part of the highly technical initial report but cautioned that his investigation was continuing.

    "This is an interim report. It is not the whole story by a long shot," he said at a press conference in New York.

    Oil-for-food was set up to help Iraqis cope with the sanctions slapped on Saddam's government over its 1990 invasion of Kuwait, which sparked the 1991 Gulf War.

    Under UN supervision from 1996 to 2003, Baghdad was allowed to sell oil and use the revenues to purchase humanitarian supplies. Baghdad was allowed to decide who purchased the oil.

    The Volcker report said Sevan asked for allocations on behalf of African Middle East Petroleum, which it said turned a 1.5 million-dollar profit on some 7.3 million barrels it received with Sevan's assistance.

    Iraqi officials "certainly thought they were buying influence," Volcker said, and his report said Baghdad wanted help in getting spare parts -- restricted by the sanctions -- to rebuild its oil industry.

    The report cited "evidence of Mr Sevan's receipt of large cash payments," namely some 160,000 dollars that Sevan claimed he had got from an elderly aunt in his home country of Cyprus.

    It said the aunt's "modest pension" and simple lifestyle "did not suggest this to be so," and concluded that Sevan had violated UN rules and engaged in activity incompatible with the proper discharge of his duties.

    "He was positioned to affect matters of substantial interest to the government of Iraq, and the government of Iraq hoped that he would act favourably in return for the allocations that he was granted," the report said.

    Volcker underlined that this first interim report did not touch on some other allegations of wrongdoing in the programme, including charges surrounding Annan's son Kojo.

    But the panel did say there was "convincing and uncontested evidence" that the selection of some contractors hired under the scheme -- including Banque Nationale de Paris -- did not conform to normal competitive bidding rules.


    How dare they suspect the integrety of this poor man? Clearly, it all came from his elderly auntie!
    No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

    Comment


    • #17
      Except that this is nonsense, unless you are willing to

      1. admit the administration lied to the entire world about how it got to the war.

      2. admit the "threat of WMD's" was crap, otherwise why would our forces let ships leave Iraq without any inspections-who knows what could be on board...
      Incompetence or deceit? This one smells to high heaven... And I can see why the Repubs are only interested in the UN and not the smugglers.
      Good catch, Gepap...

      Comment


      • #18
        I can't wait until Kofi goes down. Vaclav Havel for Secretary General!
        KH FOR OWNER!
        ASHER FOR CEO!!
        GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

        Comment


        • #19
          I think it's clear that the libs are finally abandoning the "UN is pure as the driven snow" argument as unsupportable, so now they're going for the "everyone's a crook" argument instead.
          No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

          Comment


          • #20
            I've known the UN was crooked for a couple decades, who said it wasn't? Its at least as crooked as the main members want it to be, and that means quite a bit. The US ignored Jordan's violations because Jordan sits next to Israel and we want(ed) their help.

            Comment


            • #21
              Since my thread was locked, lets discuss the implications of someone this close to Kofi being caught red-handed.
              No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

              Comment


              • #22
                This thread illustrates the horrors of Cognitive Dissonance rather well.
                "On this ship you'll refer to me as idiot, not you captain!"
                - Lone Star

                Comment


                • #23
                  The price for the no fly zone which allowed the Kurds to survive and to avoid the fate of targeted starvation that Saddam was using to punish the Shia was to allow the Turks to import oil from Iraq. It wasn't an ideal trade, but I think that the leaders involved made the right choice.

                  Allowing the Turks and the Jordanians to smuggle oil traded some of the economic effect of the oil embargo in order to largely maintain the effect of the arms embargo and the northern no fly zone. It was smart policy considering the situation, which is why it was the policy of two different administrations.

                  How this differs from the U.N. corruption and cronyism is very basic. In the first case an entity embarks upon an action that while contrary to its stated policy nevertheless furthers its goals. Thus the actors are true to their oaths to act in the best interests of their countries. In the case of the U.N. not only were the corrupt players lying about their actions, they were also subverting their own organizational goals, and thus violating their oaths to serve that organization.
                  He's got the Midas touch.
                  But he touched it too much!
                  Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    sikander

                    Bill Clinton

                    Strobe Talbot

                    Strobe Talbots approach to Russia:

                    Israeli - Jordanian peace:

                    Kurdish survival
                    "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Plus the UN guys were lining their own pockets. Bill Clinton and George Bush never received $160,000 checks from their "aunties".
                      “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

                      ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I'd like to know more about this. As Sikander has pointed out, its a different kettle of fish than the UN scandal. If it did happen as posted, I'd say it was a bad policy choice. The question is whether Bush was in a position to stop something that he inherited from Clinton (i.e. obviously he could stop it, but the repercussions so late in the game might have been judged to be too severe).
                        We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
                        If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
                        Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Sikander

                          How this differs from the U.N. corruption and cronyism is very basic. In the first case an entity embarks upon an action that while contrary to its stated policy nevertheless furthers its goals. Thus the actors are true to their oaths to act in the best interests of their countries. In the case of the U.N. not only were the corrupt players lying about their actions, they were also subverting their own organizational goals, and thus violating their oaths to serve that organization.
                          The question is how Saddam making billions during the sanctions regime is portrayed, and to what end the image is made.

                          Yes, corruption is alwasy wrong, and I hope it is rooted out. That said, you constantly hear from the right-wing press about the 21 billion dollar Food for Oil scandal!
                          21 Billion? Where the hell do they get 21 Billion? Of course, the vast majority of that illicit money was made from selling oil to turkey and jordan, which the US by policy allowed to occur- and those sales had nothing to do with the Oil for Food program either. In essence, this is a LIE constantly pushed by Republicans and their press shills.

                          As for the "wise policy" bit. Maybe it was, but it was still a violation of UN sanctions, a violation members of the Security Council allowed, as opposed to their legal obligation of acting to stop. The actions of UN administrators was corruption. The actions of UN Security Council Members who looked the other way was also a corruption, a corruption of their olbigations to the UN system.

                          To say that the US was wise to subvert the notion of the mission of the Security Council by 1. demanding economic sanctions remain while 2. Looking the other way as these sanctions were ignored in order to carry out other missions is BULL. It might not be finantial corruption, but its an act designed only to undermine the very UN system.

                          The actions the the Security Council in ignoring its own responsibilities to carry out individual policy is a subversion of th UN system in a bigger scale than the personal corruption of UN bueaucrats- people can be fired, sued, and sent to prison for their actions. Some justice is gained. BUt the actions of the Security Council members has no way of being addressed-the complete disregard for our own international obligations in order to carry out National policies is a bigger slap to the UN and the system it tries to stand for.
                          If you don't like reality, change it! me
                          "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
                          "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
                          "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Yeah here is gepap defending bureaucrats who broke the law and funneled money to the Hussein dictatorship. Gepap, you're nothing more then a liar. There is strong evidence proving this scandal did in fact happen. It isn't a lie. So please stop pulling things out of thin air, thanks.
                            For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by GePap

                              It might not be finantial corruption, but its an act designed only to undermine the very UN system.
                              ONLY? Bill Clintons and Strobe Talbotts ONLY design was to undermine the very UN system.

                              Well, well, some folks on the right own Bill Clinton a huge apology!!!!!

                              Now if only we could get them to vote for Hillary
                              "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Lord knows that hell freezes over more often than I agree with GePap (this topic comes close but I'll wait to see his mid- and end-games) but this is an amazing fezzification of what he has posted.
                                We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
                                If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
                                Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X