Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

State of the Union: What do You think?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Agathon
    Great speech. Brought tears to my eyes several times. Bush will go down in history as one of our all time great presidents.


    ?
    Well, in the case of all dedicated commies, Bush will go down in "infamy" as the most dangerous man who ever supported "capitalism."
    http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Ted Striker
      2) If I hear the damn word "freedom" one more time I'm gonna throw my tv out the window.
      Ted, being a card carrying member (you know what I mean), I fully understand your retching at the word "freedom."
      http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Alexander's Horse


        Similar reaction at US embassy - some Americans choking back tears.

        Meanwhile a journalist reported the Australians present were politely trying to choke back groans and laughter, and trying not to look at each other otherwise every Aussie would have been ROTFLTAO.
        I understand.

        It is a shame, though, about the Aussies.
        http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Admiral
          So, by my count, he used freedom 22 times. This is not including free, or other variants, which just add to the total. Also, I couldn't be arsed to add up Democracy and Liberty, but they were used rather a lot as well.

          To Bush's credit, he said some very good, and accurate things, about foreign policy. The following passage I found particularly accurate:
          "In the long term, the peace we seek will only be achieved by eliminating the conditions that feed radicalism and ideologies of murder. If whole regions of the world remain in despair and grow in hatred, they will be the recruiting grounds for terror, and that terror will stalk America and other free nations for decades."
          However, it's Bush. His idea of addressing this problem is invasion, and heavy handedness. However, the fact that he mentions this at all means that at least his speechwriter has some idea of the problems of the world (if not their solution). I find this heartening. Maybe there is some hope for the Bush administration yet.
          But I'm probably just feeling optimistic due to the effects of the SotU drinking game. Who knows.
          I think you will see a lot of "fence mending" from Bush in his second term. He realizes that having Europe "solidly" on our side can only redound to everyone's advantage.
          http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Agathon
            Bush is a moron, and so are the people who voted for him.
            Good. So long as you think this way, you will always underestimate Bush.
            http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Ned


              Kid, see my response to Dis.

              SS will be reformed and it will include private accounts. You guys on the left have always underestimated Bush.
              I can't argue about underestimating Bush, but the public is firmly against borrowing money to change social security. The AARP has also taken a stand. I really can't see it happening. Bush is still using scare tactics and I really think that more people are going to see through them as time goes by.
              I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
              - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Ned


                Good. So long as you think this way, you will always underestimate Bush.
                Not really, he's is however, overestimating voters.
                Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Ming
                  From what I read (the BBall game was good), it was a typical boring and useless speech. The repubs are saying he was great, and the Dems are picking holes in it. What else is there really to say since there was really nothing new in the speech. Heck, the biggest discussion on news radio this morning was how annoying all the applause were
                  Ming, I have been watch SOTU speeches since the 60s. I can affirm that most of them are boring, insipid and uninspired. Reagan had a few that were good, especially the one where he talked about the hero who rescued the people from the frozen Patomac after the airplane crash at the Jefferson bridge. But Bush's speeches have been uniformly good, if not great. The reason I believe is that he is speaking at a time of great events, where the strong emotions of the people are involved. People who support what Bush is doing will be driven to tears. People who oppose Bush will be driven to anger or dismay.

                  The central point here is that these are strong speeches with great ideas. They are meant to galvanize not only the American people, but the people of the world. I can only imagine how anyone living under tryanny must have felt after hearing Bush's words that American stands with them, and that they will be free.
                  http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                  Comment


                  • those oppressed multitudes were probably worried Bush would start bombing
                    Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..

                    Look, I just don't anymore, okay?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Ned
                      The central point here is that these are strong speeches with great ideas.
                      Hmmm.. I'll have to remember to go back and reread the speech... because after reading it this morning, I don't remember any real great or new ideas
                      Keep on Civin'
                      RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
                        those oppressed multitudes were probably worried Bush would start bombing
                        Horse, as usual, you got it backwards. The oppressed multitudes, as you say, are probably "hopeful." It is the oppressors who are worried.
                        http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                        Comment


                        • Ming, he directly called for the Saudis and Egyptians to grant democracy to their peoples. THAT is new.
                          http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                          Comment


                          • Hey Ming - is Ned allowed to use one of our national heroes/villains for his avatar? No need to answer I suppose...

                            Hey Ned, do you know anything about Ned Kelly? You like cop killers?

                            I mean the fact that I'm probably related to Ned Kelly through his mother has not a thing to do with it
                            Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..

                            Look, I just don't anymore, okay?

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
                              Hey Ming - is Ned allowed to use one of our national heroes/villains for his avatar? No need to answer I suppose...
                              Hmmm... no worse than most of your trolls
                              Keep on Civin'
                              RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
                                Hey Ming - is Ned allowed to use one of our national heroes/villains for his avatar? No need to answer I suppose...

                                Hey Ned, do you know anything about Ned Kelly? You like cop killers?

                                I mean the fact that I'm probably related to Ned Kelly through his mother has not a thing to do with it
                                All I can say, Horse, is that you have a great ancestor. I am surprised that you did not appropriate that moniker Ned first in honor of your heroic patron.
                                http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X