The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why has Capitalism failed to produce optimal value everywhere?
Why are you misrepresenting me like that? That seemed to come out of the blue.
How is it a misrepresentation? Is value relative or not?
"The French caused the war [Persian Gulf war, 1991]" - Ned
"you people who bash Bush have no appreciation for one of the great presidents in our history." - Ned
"I wish I had gay sex in the boy scouts" - Dissident
Re: Re: Why has Capitalism failed to produce optimal value everywhere?
Originally posted by Whoha
According to capitalists, the market determines value. There is no demand for 10 ton nails, so the ones that got built were just left out to rust. They aren't worth anything to anyone. Meanwhile the more commonly used smaller nails are worth something. What people charge for an item doesn't determine what its value is though, it is what people are willing to pay for said item.
But what people pay for an item doesn't determine it's value either. The price is just a mechanism to atract or detract supplies. If there is a shortage the price will be higher, but no value was created. There is only a situation were buyers will bid up the price.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
How is it a misrepresentation? Is value relative or not?
You claimed that I said a loaf of bread is just as valuable to a satisfied person as it is to a starving person, which I clearly do not agree with. In that sense yes value is relative, but just because a starving person would pay more does not mean that the bread is more valuable. I most definitely means that there is a problem with the market and there is a shortage, but shortages do not create value. Only labor can create value.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
"The French caused the war [Persian Gulf war, 1991]" - Ned
"you people who bash Bush have no appreciation for one of the great presidents in our history." - Ned
"I wish I had gay sex in the boy scouts" - Dissident
Originally posted by Last Conformist
Remind me why we should care about value anyway.
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok
You claimed that I said a loaf of bread is just as valuable to a satisfied person as it is to a starving person, which I clearly do not agree with. In that sense yes value is relative, but just because a starving person would pay more does not mean that the bread is more valuable. I most definitely means that there is a problem with the market and there is a shortage, but shortages do not create value. Only labor can create value.
You're going around in circles and contradicting yourself. How can you agree that the bread is more valuable to the starving person in one sentence and in the very next claim that it doesn't change the value of the bread? And how can you say that falling prices create value when you say also say only labor can create value?
"The French caused the war [Persian Gulf war, 1991]" - Ned
"you people who bash Bush have no appreciation for one of the great presidents in our history." - Ned
"I wish I had gay sex in the boy scouts" - Dissident
"The French caused the war [Persian Gulf war, 1991]" - Ned
"you people who bash Bush have no appreciation for one of the great presidents in our history." - Ned
"I wish I had gay sex in the boy scouts" - Dissident
Originally posted by Kontiki
You're going around in circles and contradicting yourself. How can you agree that the bread is more valuable to the starving person in one sentence and in the very next claim that it doesn't change the value of the bread? And how can you say that falling prices create value when you say also say only labor can create value?
How much the bread is worth to an individual is not the same as it is to society. Some people don't need bread so it doesn't have any value to them, but the bread does have value if someone else needs it. I agree that the bread is more valuable to some individuals but the total amount of value created has not increased as a whole, only for that individual.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Hence, my point that from a collection of beings the sum aggregate represents the value. However, the point stands, that sum aggregate value changes over time. The value of a horse today is significantly less than that around 1850. As a consequence, expecting optimal results in dynamic systems is a fools goal.
"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
Hence, my point that from a collection of beings the sum aggregate represents the value. However, the point stands, that sum aggregate value changes over time. The value of a horse today is significantly less than that around 1850. As a consequence, expecting optimal results in dynamic systems is a fools goal.
Expecting yes, striving for, no.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Your question posed was "Why has Capitalism failed to produce optimal value everywhere? ". Clearly that is an unrealistic expectation for any system.
"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe
Your question posed was "Why has Capitalism failed to produce optimal value everywhere? ". Clearly that is an unrealistic expectation for any system.
Ok, you get a cookie for disproving the troll.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment