I have seen a couple of comments in games to continue past 1909 and I don't mind the idea as long as ALL games go past 1909 and not individually voted on, give unfair advantages to those in excellent positions who continue to that of players in good positions who don't get to continue cause either the GM or some of the others players don't want to.
If some games continue and some don't then the ADC points should be awarded by the end of 1909 and not the end of the game after 1909. If all games finish after 1909 then ADC points can and should be awarded at the natural finish of the game.
One of the problems for awarding ADC points at the natural end is that some players are playing a 9 year strategy and not long term which is way strategically different.
I think all the GM's need to vote and it needs or be unanimous for ADC points to be delivered at the natural end of the tourney games. One NO vote and the ADC points are delivered at the end of 1909 and if the tourney games go past 1909, the ultimate outcome has no bering on ADC points.
Comments?
If some games continue and some don't then the ADC points should be awarded by the end of 1909 and not the end of the game after 1909. If all games finish after 1909 then ADC points can and should be awarded at the natural finish of the game.
One of the problems for awarding ADC points at the natural end is that some players are playing a 9 year strategy and not long term which is way strategically different.
I think all the GM's need to vote and it needs or be unanimous for ADC points to be delivered at the natural end of the tourney games. One NO vote and the ADC points are delivered at the end of 1909 and if the tourney games go past 1909, the ultimate outcome has no bering on ADC points.
Comments?
Comment