Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ADC Dip 51 South American Supremacy Fall 1836

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ADC Dip 51 South American Supremacy Fall 1836

    ADC Dip 51 South American Supremacy Fall 1836

    PRESS:

    Beware the Brazilians! Peru, Colombia, Venezuala, wake up!


    ORDERS:

    ARGENTINA (Iain Lindley)

    A Formosa-Salta
    A Corrientes-Asuncion
    A Misiones S A Corrientes-Asuncion
    F Montevideo H
    A Cordoba-Mendoza (move fails 1v1)
    A Bahia Blanca-Patagonia (move fails 1v1)


    BOLIVIA (Berzerker)

    F Bahia de Arica > Bahia Sechura (bounce 1v1 with Quito)
    F Arica > Bahia de Arica (bounce with Bahia de Arica)
    A La Paz > S Cruz
    A Pot > H


    BRAZIL (Hogfather)

    A Pantanal > Concepcion (move fails 1v1)
    F Sao Paulo > Bahia de Sao Sebastiao
    A Parana SUPPORT F Rio Grande do Sul
    A Amazonas > Orinoco
    F Boca de Navios SUPPORT F Cumana > Golfo de Paria
    F Rio Grande do Sul HOLD


    CHILE (Chazzy)

    F-Golfo de Guafo>Isl. Juan Fernandez
    A-Mendoza S A-Patagonia (support cut)
    A-Patagonia S A-Mendoza (support cut)
    F-Tierra del Fuego>Golfo de San Jorge


    COLOMBIA (Sahib)

    F Golfo de Panama - Panama (sc)
    F Cali H
    F Santa Marta S F Maracaibo - Golfo de Paria
    F Maracaibo - Golfo de Paria (bounce 2v2 with Cumana)
    A Llanos - Maracaibo (bounce with Maricaibo)


    PARAGUAY (Snowfire)

    A Asun S Conc (support cut, dislodged, may retreat to Formosa, or OTB)
    A Conc S A Asun (support cut)


    PERU (Gerwald)

    F Quito - Bahia Sechura (bounce 1v1 with Bahia de Arica)
    A LIMA - CUSCO (bounce with Aquiris Indigenous Territory)
    A IQU supports A AQUIRIS
    A AQUIRIS - CUSCO (bounce with Lima)


    VENEZEULA (Defiant)

    A-CAR S A-ANG > BAR
    A-ANG > BAR
    F-CUMANA > G. DE PARIA (bounce 2v2 with Maricaibo)


    MAP:

    http://www.geocities.com/ruffhaus8/ADC51/F1836.gif


    GM COMMENTS:

    Fall 1836 retreats are due Sunday, April 22, 23:59 EST. SnowFire, since your's is the only retreat, feel free to post here. The Winter 1836 adjustments will be due Monday, April 23, 23:59 EST. Spring 1837 orders will be due Thursday, April 26, 23:59 EST

    As always, please check for accuracy.


    ADJUSTMENTS:

    ARGENTINA - No Change
    BOLIVIA - Build 1
    BRAZIL - Build 1
    CHILE - Build 1
    COLOMBIA - Build 1
    PARAGUAY - Disband 1
    PERU - Build 1
    VENEZEULA - No Change


    GM INFORMATION:

    RUFFHAUS8
    ICQ: 63418710
    E-mail: RUFFHAUS8@aol.com


    PLAYER INFORMATION:

    ARGENTINA (Iain Lindley)
    ICQ: 33689665
    E-mail: iain@lindleys.f9.co.uk

    BOLIVIA (Berzerker)
    ICQ: 38356654
    E-mail: berzerkr@cjnetworks.com

    BRAZIL (Hogfather)
    ICQ: 102139615
    E-mail: m_carreras@hotmail.com

    CHILE (Chazzy)
    ICQ: 73667212
    E-mail: chazzy@execpc.com

    COLOMBIA (Sahib)
    ICQ: 43251116
    E-mail: sa.hi@mailcity.com

    PARAGUAY (Snowfire)
    ICQ: 35476699
    E-mail: peter.ingraham@oberlin.edu

    PERU (Gerwald)
    ICQ: 63688157
    E-mail: CaladbolgFT@aol.com

    VENEZEULA (Defiant)
    ICQ: 46172786
    E-mail: defiant@charter.net or seanc@herrschners.com


    <font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by RUFFHAUS8 (edited April 21, 2001).]</font>

  • #2
    Try it now... I'd was in the process of uploading it as you posted.

    Comment


    • #3
      Works now... sweet.
      Visit the Vote UK Discussion Forum!

      Comment


      • #4
        ADC Dip 51 South American Supremacy, Game Standings/Supply Center Count - 1836 (Fall); 38 Supply Centers Total, Solo Victory Requires Ownership of 20 Supply Centers Legend: COUNTRY - Present Leader/Former Leader (number of centers held) * Home Supply Centers listed in CAPS.

        BRAZIL (7) Hogfather
        SAO PAULO, RIO DE JANIERO, SALVADOR, MANAUS
        Rio Grande Do Sul, Maranhao, Parana

        ARGENTINA (6) Iain Lindley
        BUENOS AIRES, CORDOBA, SALTA
        Montevideo, Corrientes, Asuncion (Pa)

        COLOMBIA (6) Sahib
        BOGATA, CALI, CARTEGENA,
        Islas Galapagos, Maricaibo (V), Panama

        BOLIVIA (5) Berzerker
        LA PAZ, ANTOFAGASTA
        Santa Cruz, Arica, Potosi

        CHILE (5) Chazzy
        SANTIAGO, VALPARISO
        Patagonia, Punta Arenas, Islas Juan Fernandez

        PERU (5) Gerwald
        LIMA, TRUJILLO
        Arquiris Indigenous Territory, Quito, Iquitos

        VENEZUELA (3) Defiant
        CARACAS
        Angostura, Cumana

        PARAGUAY (1) Snowfire
        CONCEPCION

        Comment


        • #5
          Broken map link? I can't get to it anyway...
          Visit the Vote UK Discussion Forum!

          Comment


          • #6
            Bah. I don't retreat OTB.
            All syllogisms have three parts.
            Therefore this is not a syllogism.

            Comment


            • #7
              Well, very well. Now I know what you don't do. When you submit your retreat order, I'll note it on the map.

              Comment


              • #8
                What is it that makes you two liking each other like that? Come on, Ruffy, he had the choice between OTB and Formosa. He said "not OTB", now I believe you should be able to update the map even without further input by Snowie

                Comment


                • #9
                  This reminds me of a lecture I heard recently by one Douglas Bridges, a professor from New Zealand visiting Oberlin (really screwed up implaceable accent, too. He was born in Scotland, went to college in England, and spent the last ten yeras of his life in NZ). Described as being on the "lunatic fringe" of mathematics by our own head of the math department, his lecture on Constructive mathematics basically detailed how it worked, and one of the more important parts was that Constructive mathematics denies the statement "P or not P." In other words, you have to actually prove P in constructive mathematics to show it, you can 't just show that not P is impossible and therefore P must be true (somehow). There were some interesting conclusions from this and then he showed how you can still do a lot of higher mathematics even without these assumptions we take for granted.

                  So, it seems RUFFHAUS is an advocate of constructive diplomatics. I'll oblige; the army retreats to Formosa (my previous comment referred to the fact that why should I give extra information to my opponents on what to build? Leave 'em in suspense.).
                  All syllogisms have three parts.
                  Therefore this is not a syllogism.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Thank you. I'm a not a proponent of anything but a straight answer.

                    I always list OTB as a retreat option (like all other available choices) as is my standard process for adjudication. I do this because it an OTB retreat is often a valid tactical order and an option that some players never use, making me wonder if they know that they are allowed to. In any case I'm not trying to be insulting when I suggest it. I completely understand the option to use the retreat as has now been exercised. I'm not pushing either path. And I'm not the one who started with the sarcasim.

                    Map updated. Adjustments due Monday evening, thank you.
                    [This message has been edited by RUFFHAUS8 (edited April 22, 2001).]

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Sahib,
                      I believe Ruff is only being gaming correctly, you say that in the WM tournament and they won't put up with it, you tell them what you are going to do, not what you don't do as a personal play technique.
                      Lets always remember the passangers on United Flight 93, true heroes in every sense of the word!

                      (Quick! Someone! Anyone! Sava! Come help! )-mrmitchell

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Sighhhhhhhhhhhh. Why am I always misinterpreted?

                        RUFFHAUS, I was not being sarcastic! I was not going against you. Of course you should list all the retreats. I would do the same thing. And you certainly shouldn't retreat for me. I was merely saying "bah" because the game isn't going terribly well at the moment. I wasn't annoyed at you for not retreating for me or anything. I was just saying that there's no way I would retreat OTB. This is because (with regards to the tactics mentioned earlier) retreating OTB is a valid tactical action only in Spring or if you have 0 builds or greater. This is to allow you to destroy a useless advanced unit so you can rebuild the unit at home. If you have disbands, then there's no reason to telegraph which unit you'll disband... so because of this, there was no way I'd retreat OTB. I added in a "bah" because I am now down to 1 SC. Since there was only one other retreat, I figured that would be enough. This was in no way an attack or a snide comment or whatever! Or at least I never intended it to be, scout's honor.

                        Defiant, yes, but this is not WM. Obviously for that I would submit retreats straight. This was an informal "post your retreat here" type thing. I mean look at all the banter in the threads for some of the World Diplomacy type threads, or some other things- "My glorious army advances to Formosa to raise an army of Argentinian partisans to strike at the evil government strangling Southern South America" or something. How is that any different from what I said, if not even more informal?
                        All syllogisms have three parts.
                        Therefore this is not a syllogism.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Okay.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Because your army isn't very glorious and the Chileans are evil?
                            Visit the Vote UK Discussion Forum!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Now, now why would you want to pick on the peace loving people of Chile ? All we want is a little breathing room.... :=]

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X