Does anyone know what type of ships were current during the Roman civil wars? Specifically during the conflict between Caesar and Pompey? BeBro has some excellent examples in his Imperium Romanum, but little in the way of background information. Thanks.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Roman Civil War
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
"Io non volgo le spalle dinnanzi al nemico!!!" - il Conte di San Sebastiano al messo del comandante in capo, battaglia dell'Assietta
"E' più facile far passare un cammello per la cruna di un ago che un pensiero nel cervello di Bush!!!" - Zelig
"Live fire, and not cold steel, now resolve battles" - Marshall de Puysegur
-
Pompey's fleet of 200 ships with which he tackled the Mediterranean pirates included all sizes of galley up to a 'ten' (deceres - very few in the fleet). Apparently, by far the most common was the trireme with the smallest being the light galleys (liburnae) which became more popular under Augustus in the Rhine and Danube fleets a few decades later.
Looking at BeBro's range, the following would be appropriate (despite the dates shown by the graphics). Obviously, the bottom middle ship is a trade ship rather than a warship.
In terms of fighting capability they would be ranked as follows (in descending order): deceres, hepteres, quinquereme, liburnian.
Comment
-
great idea for a scenario
Originally posted by fairline
In terms of fighting capability they would be ranked as follows (in descending order): deceres, hepteres, quinquereme, liburnian.
Especially ships of that type later in the civil war were very well equipped with throwing engines, but, due to their light construction and smaller crews of little or no use in enter combat or ram attacks against much heavier ships. Liburnians were however able to sink those ships effectively via ranged attacks with fire catapults. I think Actium was a clear decision between the heavy, but slow warships of M.Antonius and Kleopatra and more agile ships of Agrippa (mainly Liburnians from what I read).
This is of course difficult to simulate in civ2, I just want to say that these light ships weren´t without chances against bigger galleys...Blah
Comment
-
Thanks guys. This scenario will run from 55-44 BC. So if I give the 4 Roman factions a number of obsolete Hepteres and Quinqueremes and allow them to build Decimeres and to research the tech for Liburnes, will that be reasonable? (Isn't scenario making a real science? )
I could allow the Egyptians (Greeks) to build Hepteres and Quinqs as well.
The Gauls had a sturdy ocean going fleet of sailing ships which caused Caesar quite a bit of trouble before he defeated it. Does anyone have a picture?
I'm not sure if the Parthians had a fleet. Anyone know?
BeBro, in Imperium Romanum you have Liburnes available with the discovery of "Harpax". Is that piracy?
Comment
-
I am probably wrong here but I thought that "Harpax" was a sort of early composite material or like an epoxy."I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me." -- General George S. Patton
"Guinness sucks!" -- Me
Comment
-
Originally posted by techumseh
BeBro, in Imperium Romanum you have Liburnes available with the discovery of "Harpax". Is that piracy?
I´m not sure if this weapon was used by Liburnians directly, because as said above, they weren´t that good in enter combat against heavier ships. I can only speculate here - maybe this weapon was used esp. by heavier ships against the highly maneuverable Liburnians (it was difficult for bigger ships to come into position for a classical board to board enter battle), or it could of course also be useful in fights between similar types of ships (Liburnian vs. Liburnian).
I´m however quite sure that this weapon was introduced in late republican/civil war times.
So if I give the 4 Roman factions a number of obsolete Hepteres and Quinqueremes and allow them to build Decimeres and to research the tech for Liburnes, will that be reasonable?Blah
Comment
-
Techumseh,
How's your French?
I´m not sure if this weapon was used by Liburnians directly, because as said above, they weren´t that good in enter combat against heavier shipsLast edited by fairline; October 18, 2002, 12:11.
Comment
-
"Io non volgo le spalle dinnanzi al nemico!!!" - il Conte di San Sebastiano al messo del comandante in capo, battaglia dell'Assietta
"E' più facile far passare un cammello per la cruna di un ago che un pensiero nel cervello di Bush!!!" - Zelig
"Live fire, and not cold steel, now resolve battles" - Marshall de Puysegur
Comment
-
Originally posted by fairline
Techumseh,
How's your French?
Merci, mon ami.
Comment
-
"Io non volgo le spalle dinnanzi al nemico!!!" - il Conte di San Sebastiano al messo del comandante in capo, battaglia dell'Assietta
"E' più facile far passare un cammello per la cruna di un ago che un pensiero nel cervello di Bush!!!" - Zelig
"Live fire, and not cold steel, now resolve battles" - Marshall de Puysegur
Comment
-
Originally posted by fairline
BeBro: this website implies that liburnae did use the harpax/harpago(?) (I think - my French is rubbish )
However, the site has some other links with some nice pics of models and additional info even in English:
http://www.rodlangton.com/ancient/300scale.htm (some of the other links there are also nice)Blah
Comment
-
Good enough to know that "Version anglaise d'apres site officiel" means that there's an English version!
Comment
-
Ehi... les fransè uses idiot... imbecille is used by italians..."Io non volgo le spalle dinnanzi al nemico!!!" - il Conte di San Sebastiano al messo del comandante in capo, battaglia dell'Assietta
"E' più facile far passare un cammello per la cruna di un ago che un pensiero nel cervello di Bush!!!" - Zelig
"Live fire, and not cold steel, now resolve battles" - Marshall de Puysegur
Comment
Comment