Attack vs Defense vs neutral? what is best style

[ottok]

Attack vs Defense vs neutral? what is best style

[blackclove]

I prefer scenarios where I get to attack and build a huge empire, but then, I also like ones where huge hordes of opponents attack me and I have to hold my position... I guess I like all of them.

Huh.

[Mao]

I'm just here to confirm ottok said something coherant! So let it be written, so let it be done!

[Fast_Eddie]

Mao, that's mean.

[Mao]

OK OK, I apologize ottok, I was kidding. Anyway, forgive? I personally prefer defense as to say "how long can I hold on against insurmountable odds?"

[Fast_Eddie]

I just don't like people making fun of others when it's something that they are really trying hard at.

And I like what scenarios I can beat.

My favorite scenario is still probably the WW2 scenario that came with civ. I always have a blast playing that, because it's not historical at all! It's just me, as the Germans, kicking ass. So it's attacking for me.

[mrtemba]

i agree with fast eddie! that was one smooth scenario! attack attack attack attack attack! but actually i also like it when you have to work hard just to be able to attack.

[Mao]

Try being the neutrals, Spanish, or Turks in that scenario and you'll what I'm talking about when you have to hold on.

[Fast_Eddie]

Yeah Temba! Good point. Building up for a big attack is great too!

I've tried it with the Spanish and the Turks, and let me tell you, that was the stupidest game of civ I ever played! Nobody attacked me. Nobody attacked each other. The only city that was taken over was Paris. I refuse to play that as anyone other than the Germans and the Russians.

[St Leo]

Agressive Civilized Expansionist civs are generally better than Rational Civilized Perfectionist civs(who are a real thorn in the side).:-)

------------------
St. Leo
http://ziggurat.sidgames.com/
http://www.sidgames.com/forums/