Update of Crisis of the New World Order

[POTUS]

[gerryandersson]

When a unit is destroyd event use the anybody triger.

UNITKILLED
unit=X
attacker=Anybody
defender=Y
@THEN

[Paul Hanson]

Just out of curiousity, how are you going to update the scenario?

[POTUS]

Ok. Thanks gerryandersson.

I am making the scenario more accurate and making the scenario harder by increasing the number of rebels. Also, it makes war more expensive.

I am thinking of making civillians a weak partisan unit to reflect the reality that often terrorists and soldiers hide in crowds of civillians i.e. Somalia, Israel, and Iraq. Then, however, if they are attacked, the attacking nation loses money, i.e. boycott or sanctions.

[Palaiologos]

Originally posted by gerryandersson
When a unit is destroyd event use the anybody triger.

UNITKILLED
unit=X
attacker=Anybody
defender=Y
@THEN

No, no, no.

This formula is incomplete.

UNITKILLED
unit=X
attacker=Anybody
defender=Y
@THEN
CHANGEMONEY
receiver=Triggerattacker
amount=x(or - x)


add the above lines. Otherwise you'll either have to create a seperate event for each civ(receiver=Yankees, receiver=Soviets etc,etc)

[jeibel]

Remember of the bug (which CNWO exploits to force "joint" peacekeeping missions) because any given triggerattacker works only (and always apply thereafter) to the first one to trigger it.. IIRC it isn't possible to add new events to the scn, since it's event space is already maxed out cause of these (it has the different event file to have civ-specific evnt work proprly.)

GO INDIA !!!! ;p

[POTUS]

After testing I have discovered that jeibel was correct. However I was able to add new events with the in-game editor.

[gerryandersson]

Originally posted by Palaiologos


No, no, no.

This formula is incomplete.

UNITKILLED
unit=X
attacker=Anybody
defender=Y
@THEN
CHANGEMONEY
receiver=Triggerattacker
amount=x(or - x)


add the above lines. Otherwise you'll either have to create a seperate event for each civ(receiver=Yankees, receiver=Soviets etc,etc)

I know my formula was incomplete but I thout he would understand it anyway.

[POTUS]

I did understand.

I am debating, should I have more rebels, or penalties for attacking civillians?

[Squonk]

Originally posted by POTUS
I am debating, should I have more rebels, or penalties for attacking civillians?

Definitely more rebels. They should pose a serious challenge for the minor civs.

[POTUS]

Yes, but the civillians have previously caused me to lose more than half of my gold, I was at 33570, in one turn during an offensive against China.

[Arthedain]

POTUS you should check these to links out for more ideas:

http://www.cdgroup.org/forums/tbs/civ2/viewtopic.php?t=136

http://www.cdgroup.org/forums/tbs/civ2/viewtopic.php?t=137

I also think yuo should have a bigger map

[Henrik]

Did anyone check with the author of the scenario if he'd like someone to edit his work?

I think Andrew Livings is still around.

Just a thought...

[fairline]

Indeed....

[POTUS]

I tried to contact Andrew Livings, however, his email, or mine I'm not sure, didn't work and so, I decided to just start, and hope that he would allow me to.